IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on charter-ietf-lamps-02-00: (with COMMENT)

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 23 May 2018 20:07 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B0CB12D778; Wed, 23 May 2018 13:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.711
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.711 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zHrNO5ZrLCFP; Wed, 23 May 2018 13:07:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59CA7127010; Wed, 23 May 2018 13:07:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122333.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w4NK6qWU008360; Wed, 23 May 2018 21:07:02 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=3sNBbqd5OBF+0/T0n13gh6RPmwXvtJ3eiDJ/Q6aR6WA=; b=IQQCIc7zbIUrRHYzFKlQS1cAP2es1ymuJ9yK1OkDjLk7x1gI+AYoXVHkBQ4qUqAb9osn 5qW5XcnqDEOwCj7aM9SATBKMktWmN2HdZvxzLGMENIUf7LbXE06V0DNZoJbO3+1byljZ TGSdO0ResC3grLU2SObvcM7Ene3sqagDj3sjY36Ff+d/yVff38aoImp3YnWM7V+IdVFb u95C/C8hmSRrnZgSxZ0O3Ji29f3bnfjZbOkxWaSo0yr24C6nIs29UK/aSeVq8TmDnF20 0DQwkpcni/y5FeIjeeKc0clQGPFR3r94AW58KrIlIZp6Pq1l33RO2wkd1BtC72AwXMzG kA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint4 (a96-6-114-87.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [96.6.114.87] (may be forged)) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2j5e91g4mh-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 23 May 2018 21:07:01 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id w4NK68To008096; Wed, 23 May 2018 16:07:00 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.27.25]) by prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2j2f8vu154-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 23 May 2018 16:07:00 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.101) by ustx2ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Wed, 23 May 2018 15:07:00 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.6.131]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.6.131]) with mapi id 15.00.1365.000; Wed, 23 May 2018 15:07:00 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
CC: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lamps] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on charter-ietf-lamps-02-00: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHT8sHQeu/yCKfdfEmAmiT4c7N2fKQ+CNUA//++PwCAAEjUgP//vmqA
Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 20:06:59 +0000
Message-ID: <CAE264B9-7724-47CC-ACC9-1EAAC2C8D57F@akamai.com>
References: <152709922899.26838.11074435093932176947.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <41e7a726-0175-7e3d-d35c-d413bf01ea12@nostrum.com> <32DD6ED8-F2C9-4193-98FA-BC7876634318@akamai.com> <65287CF3-4150-4A07-99D8-D3855901CB94@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <65287CF3-4150-4A07-99D8-D3855901CB94@vigilsec.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.d.0.180513
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.41.7]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <9985363466DDD344B8FF4E6AA2B76858@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-05-23_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=477 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1805230196
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-05-23_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=398 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1805230196
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/WgWhdVof-Y4RdTE8u_PN_NvYK-4>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on charter-ietf-lamps-02-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 20:07:04 -0000

>    That is not quite what he said.  Kenny said that we should not adopt a post-quantum secure algorithm.  Kenny did not say we should not find ways to use pre-shared secrets to bolster the security of the techniques we are already using.
  
You are right, thanks for the correction.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email