IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Preparing the shepherd write-up for rfc6844bis

fujiwara@jprs.co.jp Mon, 26 November 2018 05:09 UTC

Return-Path: <fujiwara@jprs.co.jp>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78744128CE4 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 21:09:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1ufUGn9h5d9x for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 21:09:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from off-send01.osa.jprs.co.jp (off-send01.osa.jprs.co.jp [IPv6:2001:218:3001:17::10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45E8C1271FF for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 21:09:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from off-sendsmg01.osa.jprs.co.jp (off-sendsmg01.osa.jprs.co.jp [172.23.8.61]) by off-send01.osa.jprs.co.jp (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id wAQ59Tra016963; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 14:09:30 +0900
Received: from off-sendsmg01.osa.jprs.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss71 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 303A51800B8; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 14:09:29 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost (off-cpu05.osa.jprs.co.jp [172.23.4.15]) by off-sendsmg01.osa.jprs.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B4281800B2; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 14:09:29 +0900 (JST)
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 14:09:29 +0900
Message-Id: <20181126.140929.1660685088175275606.fujiwara@jprs.co.jp>
To: housley@vigilsec.com
Cc: rob.stradling@comodo.com, jsha@letsencrypt.org, phill@hallambaker.com, spasm@ietf.org
From: fujiwara@jprs.co.jp
In-Reply-To: <7FC03EEB-0D87-4454-805C-62DBCBA845C3@vigilsec.com>
References: <7FC03EEB-0D87-4454-805C-62DBCBA845C3@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.6 on Emacs 24.4 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1690-8.2.0.1013-24246.004
X-TM-AS-Result: No--0.332-5.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--0.332-5.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: R/Cd05nu1VtCXIGdsOwlUu5i6weAmSDKZggZX8gYmrVjPrlNB+gMq2ZZ ehyLCm5fTsehiyaLk1RvA7FpFI3oUI+eiI05y0fpwrUhv0kAAvF8ENPezfd84psoi2XrUn/JyeM tMD9QOgBj9cVL65YctZYKjKNsNkQ5Zz0AAGWYgqKM1Gu9aimtieTCMddcL/gjro1URZJFbJv5IN E1jwzPu5pQGMYyZdw+UjnqU0P/eI924Q+1cnlINQBG4+wDeM+Xa6Fmi+IWmKnXUOKIrLRgTmAKi tWBwppDZBVQRZw+zHNKemLhqA7Wjm4DIJPw+zue1PeR9HWWCpTMJ5bhTjeL1cOC91ofseCc
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/X2WdJFv58gTaIGopEskGe9YsFrE>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Preparing the shepherd write-up for rfc6844bis
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 05:09:56 -0000

# Sorry I missed WGLC mails.

1. Before proceeding, please fix errata of RFC 6844.
   Most of them still remain.

   See https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/rfc6844

2. At section 9 IANA considerations, Reference should be changed as this draft
   because this draft obsoletes RFC 6844.

   See RFC 6891. The RFC changed reference from obsoleted RFC 2671 to this RFC.

I believe IESG and IANA will find and fix them, but please fix before them.

--
Kazunori Fujiwara, JPRS <fujiwara@jprs.co.jp>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email