Re: [lamps] Call for adoption of draft-housley-hash-of-root-key-cert-extn

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Sat, 14 July 2018 18:28 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FBAC130E77 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 11:28:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wDCMwr4-daQw for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 11:28:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB9C5130E34 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 11:28:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44153300A44 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 14:28:17 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id c_lq_T9aVQuT for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 14:28:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from dhcp-8ced.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-8ced.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.140.237]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 683A43005C6; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 14:28:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <E99E4DB3-D77E-4009-A716-072ACF9A3E95@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6682B964-B02A-4EC5-B6C6-491A421B358B"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.4 \(3445.8.2\))
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 14:28:15 -0400
In-Reply-To: <F47E0433-EC98-456D-A909-A35B1476C7DF@akamai.com>
Cc: Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek@digicert.com>, SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@akamai.com>
References: <F47E0433-EC98-456D-A909-A35B1476C7DF@akamai.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.8.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/XAa-mLasjHZZk1dwwI5MJ6ROjKw>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Call for adoption of draft-housley-hash-of-root-key-cert-extn
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 18:28:22 -0000

Rich:

Thanks for the support.

> >It has been suggested that the WG adopt draft-housley-hash-of-root-key-cert-extn as the starting point for this work.
>  
> SET did this for their root a long time ago.  Maybe re-use the OID?
>  
> At any rate, I support this.

I looked at this, and they used a cumbersome syntax.

hashedRootKey EXTENSION ::= {               -- Only in root certificates
   SYNTAX         HashedRootKeySyntax
   CRITICAL       TRUE
   IDENTIFIED BY id-set-hashedRootKey
}

HashedRootKeySyntax ::= RootKeyThumb

RootKeyThumb ::= SEQUENCE {
   rootKeyThumbprint  DD { SubjectPublicKeyInfo{{SupportedAlgorithms}} }
}

Where DD expands to a CMS DigestedData.

I think you will find the syntax in the Internet-Draft much more straightforward.

Russ