[lamps] LAMPS at IETF 105

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Tue, 23 April 2019 21:10 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099DE12021B for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 14:10:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YmyyZaptw1zh for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 14:10:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61A2812004B for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 14:10:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 196DA300AB9 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 16:52:28 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net []) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 6qWUEsgcFSri for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 16:52:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (unknown []) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF1083001F1; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 16:52:26 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.8\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN6PR14MB11061D5758B60B09513D21C683230@BN6PR14MB1106.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 17:10:43 -0400
Cc: Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek@digicert.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <63576812-B7A5-4AA8-A366-DDA3B2ABE59B@vigilsec.com>
References: <155596905782.21170.3345526053472471283.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4799209C-5C08-4E92-9203-E2A2970AA316@vigilsec.com> <BN6PR14MB11061D5758B60B09513D21C683230@BN6PR14MB1106.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
To: SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.8)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/XvZADMloplIV-3ORLkyIMniEm3E>
Subject: [lamps] LAMPS at IETF 105
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 21:10:48 -0000

In the last few days before IETF 104, we got a flurry of requests to present in the LAMPS WG.  In an effort to learn about them sooner, we are asking whether anyone has topics to discuss in July at IETF 105.  The IESG is going through the re-charter process, so we can assume that the header protection work item will be approved by the time that we meet in July.

Russ & Tim