Re: [lamps] Starting work to CAA and SHAKE

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Sun, 17 September 2017 18:17 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8007C1332D7 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 11:17:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p_0D-W1AsQGJ for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 11:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x22c.google.com (mail-io0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B74121330AE for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 11:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id v36so14244891ioi.1 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 11:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=1BGNoEzRqKyL8X+TpeBthuk4DEbDIuiojGj7MRpxCPs=; b=YRo8QJ/UwEsWkW/ei6udHdKfH/6DYkJubSKRJCppk4rxR4H2dgiVK3IytXNo/QrIjA I1hdX1u5ITVw39jFreQxzKUMAv9jr4algqeFI5DKTfWwe48H4XpaqvxX9ZSfgqioHP9X 7Q/dU1iUaMj8A9+xLzRQ7ZIrj/h+7jfE+9yfGp91y7w7A8pMi0MN+qaMmlGNrbWJod9U WTckUV7TL6CXyZReEg6x8ng8PoorSVOPXE2oddvPemOPiCenmBT6yuzJRIPQXexPyDMJ IJ0YMbodqpwFH0gk2aw3tqddc14qpwvi456upvDE0Un8Dbzte/Rq0n4zjU2c+3O79DI8 GYEw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1BGNoEzRqKyL8X+TpeBthuk4DEbDIuiojGj7MRpxCPs=; b=GzUwK4W12IkN/8wVL23NEpTg5O7QdIrigtIF4/IXesQmAtDgK5v7vGemhT9jQN2sjH Flp/iZz2uHf9pPfNFL8CkUVB4nlGeP1pbIbtxKpFkkOdzDHg8x6DhXGnyk8Veu4SZ76U /aAB5XH5mqkzfsPt7q/dAOAaQrN6IGwLL+Pg2uLFzlqdrD+MOaiioYQpm2kA5Wv5xm9b SQ25YAlef2wJIy2xluJuiB9ZISLjglY9eNUF7RkamY0wyErwWj6oekQfiupXoDYdRarb 6bGGyjSX1tnoT7deMvjIQ5NBnwh/nwil2NUHP2uQGWcXKKqBZ1AcFnz5TicTkMbzejZ8 K72w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUiF8kQQpuCQtiavd0LBpbY6OS8H2o1dbe9URQNhpbv8IVrY0N+0 Tg4gFitkZmBPLOHoQJQXL0yhMSaewFXeBJ0IubY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QCGAOw8H3+S6C4SzbMLMEwXGDBgUO9Wt9/XhULuMZfs93ALp9ZTYZxb/5O/gwjT6xT5Z0ynm6HezTgIn+ULzRY=
X-Received: by 10.202.220.133 with SMTP id t127mr17883309oig.130.1505672227850; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 11:17:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: hallam@gmail.com
Received: by 10.157.46.177 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 11:17:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <80086CAE-8B03-4E3B-8715-07DDD1B00A0D@vigilsec.com>
References: <D774A9B1-F765-4BDA-9D78-D584B4B0EFF8@vigilsec.com> <BB336464-9936-450E-9463-0B18F588BAC4@akamai.com> <80086CAE-8B03-4E3B-8715-07DDD1B00A0D@vigilsec.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 14:17:07 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: QcDmD4UofCGdujPi3NoIcRay_o8
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwidOWtFqba=MGsvYtUeg+ggW-KjzTU5WjXzwr3G2j-DfQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: Rich Salz <rsalz@akamai.com>, "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113d59764a11bd055966a2c7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/Y_D6nkInmOydu00rLnrw8lGAcSg>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Starting work to CAA and SHAKE
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 18:17:13 -0000

I am willing to edit the CAA document.

I think the main thing there is to decide what we actually want to do with
the DNS discovery scheme.

So the first thing is to capture the issues from deployment last week.


On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:

>
> > That looks fine to me.  Where you asking the WG for input or something?
>
> We have two documents on CAA:
>         - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5065
>         - https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-hoffman-andrews-caa-
> simplification-01.txt
>
> How does the mail list want to proceed?
>
> My note got one person to raise their hand to work on the SHAKE document.
> Once that is posted as an individual draft, we can see if the mail list
> wants to adopt it.
>
> Russ
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm
>