Re: [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8649 (7069)

Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com> Wed, 03 August 2022 21:34 UTC

Return-Path: <csmiley@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA5D6C14792E for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 14:34:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jriodGN9144a for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 14:34:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1283AC14CF09 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 14:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6FAE424B44D; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 14:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1g4XW2bMl3Nk; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 14:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.14] (cpe-76-95-228-63.socal.res.rr.com [76.95.228.63]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6AAD6424B44B; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 14:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220802222116.2D29B1BA496A@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:34:12 -0700
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AD7BBD05-2DC4-4B1E-9144-13218B9B34BD@amsl.com>
References: <20220802222116.2D29B1BA496A@rfcpa.amsl.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, Paul Wouters <paul.wouters@aiven.io>, Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek@digicert.com>, spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/ZLS5FNw56sKA4AbTb6dm2TQ6x0g>
Subject: Re: [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8649 (7069)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2022 21:34:20 -0000

Greetings,

FYI - this report has been deleted as junk.

Thank you.

RFC Editor/cs


> On Aug 2, 2022, at 3:21 PM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8649,
> "Hash Of Root Key Certificate Extension".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7069
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Sira Thampitak <tunsira15@gmail.com>
> 
> Section: Global
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> where Technical is an error in the technical content (This includes changes to the usage of RFC 2119 keywords.) and Editorial is a spelling, grammar, punctuation, or syntax error that does not affect the technical meaning.
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> where Technical is an error in the technical content (This includes changes to the usage of RFC 8649 and Editorial is a spelling, grammar, punctuation, or syntax error that does not affect the technical sup
> port 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> Note
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8649 (draft-ietf-lamps-hash-of-root-key-cert-extn-07)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Hash Of Root Key Certificate Extension
> Publication Date    : August 2019
> Author(s)           : R. Housley
> Category            : INFORMATIONAL
> Source              : Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>