Re: [lamps] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5751-bis-07

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Thu, 05 July 2018 14:23 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83D18130E2A; Thu, 5 Jul 2018 07:23:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=xg+04vVZ; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=MYg5M41I
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9YsvWiCnTno1; Thu, 5 Jul 2018 07:23:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EFAE120049; Thu, 5 Jul 2018 07:23:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B1D721D07; Thu, 5 Jul 2018 10:23:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 05 Jul 2018 10:23:32 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h=cc :content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm3; bh=LCJq9v9mygne2G4wdgBWqTbiRAn9Hcnedu+CYt5kIYo=; b=xg+04vVZ vZ/u8A9LOL5Fq/Im4MKbLV+YOAA5sk0m+PnReHvkLPKBGv0rQUv/wEQNfCBoWAfo /zsadPaehEsJ0WdCuB3e+mrE8U1mIpHEWC83FAfdFpi4H4zTBz5Sl6Je6fdIOGTU ApZC4nJPVuNJikWt/xKHjddnJpvrRvzBvuVfUJyggMtoAI3V8WRn8Y66coRu+QDK iHzx3D1QoTmg5gL/FTc9FZyBAZ4zbkFOof47mjcgk3rAkMUPLX1kOozxpPMlteMX oA69iEkuOzytXG8GzEbm/xSpsZhUkCJRTISauexO7ltU9lTU4fK2rhj1LWuNKYIT wftK+sti/9DKqA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=LCJq9v9mygne2G4wdgBWqTbiRAn9H cnedu+CYt5kIYo=; b=MYg5M41IrUcnHqisfF5euzi60A2EGJlFOXu7wFG6fAJG8 1RXh3ARikpUKh7SuX0ku3fgJmmuydEr+Ol8xyKOCd6NVz5X0iRmIj+13jTd1gPWH okBD6ficUbcsO9GK5LhSEIUFbtpWbWemk24hnjY85Ipn4vT9pGsY+vw09kHtwBx6 Tt4tOPLZhaISOhbpk+oGjbei/EhaUzOpexQEHimzExLDQyfyNwEjSKJZqhMEiPLB KiMo2zwboEDj+VEwO0bCYoK6xVLNlt011Ycx4G2rbrGHZKmkUogqIBUsZBFIAUuS RNh5WOdgwtVx3ulqvQGwsu6tyH1VIl5xt2HlMJTBQ==
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:5Ck-W2OLujJ7USXpYQxmPmJa6g4nOAIDniSOqAZJ_ncBAPxYd5QcpQ> <xmx:5Ck-W65s3AhncQrtdU2wf5kKK5VvhGQH-kePFkgQFzQS16NzqO2G0g> <xmx:5Ck-W6Y5VEkYPArrloC6tQDcOv-b70PqHOS0yK80Z61NGgyrjGdvwg> <xmx:5Ck-W3e6mZbmc74V3xAQN9mKRXT_jB-lloWjEA3d2NTg-9-S_kvMBA> <xmx:5Ck-W56aWWI4xsP0rWg7WiYR2RFfacdE4zrvOVyTjtbZG5GY52ca3A> <xmx:5Ck-Wz5qi-tLSZrDDszJb9IV-spgc9nOeYhIY1mBU3dW-7lMkLii1w>
X-ME-Sender: <xms:5Ck-W_guXYuB2tC4Zv2bMHRiKoe8ea9wWHxyHBTV0Gm2xPSYR57svw>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro2.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.88]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CDC8810273; Thu, 5 Jul 2018 10:23:31 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Message-Id: <8F51506C-5FD0-4E43-9165-5941104C260E@cooperw.in>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0BD3AA21-C1E9-4016-8002-3048FBF8632D"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.4 \(3445.8.2\))
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 10:23:30 -0400
In-Reply-To: <052101d3e247$09dd2680$1d977380$@augustcellars.com>
Cc: David Schinazi <dschinazi@apple.com>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, spasm@ietf.org, draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5751-bis.all@ietf.org
To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
References: <152480069184.6083.13015201919417586774@ietfa.amsl.com> <052101d3e247$09dd2680$1d977380$@augustcellars.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.8.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/ZprfBPI4_L0Ihcc4eH1VSmhSqw0>
Subject: Re: [lamps] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5751-bis-07
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2018 14:23:38 -0000

David, thanks for your review. Jim, thanks for your response. I entered a Yes ballot.

Alissa

> On May 2, 2018, at 2:54 PM, Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> wrote:
> 
> I have published a -08 with these changes.
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Schinazi <dschinazi@apple.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2018 8:45 PM
>> To: gen-art@ietf.org
>> Cc: spasm@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org; draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5751-bis.all@ietf.org
>> Subject: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5751-bis-07
>> 
>> Reviewer: David Schinazi
>> Review result: Ready
>> 
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review
>> Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for
>> the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call
>> comments.
>> 
>> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>> 
>> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>> 
>> Document: draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5751-bis-07
>> Reviewer: David Schinazi
>> Review Date: 2018-04-26
>> IETF LC End Date: 2018-04-27
>> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
>> 
>> Summary:
>>    This document is clearly written and does a nice job of explaining the
>>    rationale and historical context of the decisions it made.
>> 
>> Major issues:
>>    None noticed during this review
>> 
>> Minor issues:
>>    I was slightly confused by the description of AuthEnvelopedData in 2.4.4:
>>    it seems to describe data protected by a symmetric AEAD but then
>> mentions
>>    asymmetric keys. But this could be due to my lack of expertise in S/MIME.
> 
> I have tried to clear this up.  The following sentence has been added
> 
>            In order to distribute the symmetric key, a sender needs to have access to a public key for each intended
>            message recipient to use this service.
> 
>> 
>> Nits/editorial comments:
>>    I believe the RFC2119 reference should also mention RFC8174.
> 
> Done
> 
> Jim
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org <mailto:Gen-art@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>