[lamps] Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-lamps-5g-nftypes-08: (with COMMENT)

[Paul Wouters via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lamps-5g-nftypes-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-5g-nftypes/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for the document.

I just have one question.

   This extension MUST NOT be marked critical.

Why not? One can argue this is greenField deployment but it would be a rather big one :P

>From what I am reading, this extension is required for 5g, so why not mark it critical if
the extension is not understood?