Re: [lamps] Call for adoption of draft-turner-lamps-nist-pqc-kem-certificates

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Mon, 15 August 2022 19:00 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06714C19D46A for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 12:00:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W4uGmKfgMhoz for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 12:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x830.google.com (mail-qt1-x830.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::830]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97659C152571 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 11:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x830.google.com with SMTP id cr9so6138636qtb.13 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 11:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=/tC90LPFEzIO4AzWVYwsWGBWaIbNQmziGBvemyZAVOA=; b=kicqfxiLTOntOrdgD5St3hSZzcC/WAWUjqrXOoQUBp7pTuNg4jnrjUmJbYbqMk1H4D EyKjweU6jVirKwrOYPzXMb3/UvaQC9BQP4ictqnveYyMus60TVG/mM+C1nuZeSwtgFhH BmpAH42dmqKkht1Ip119uZsGdtSqd6KEETWKk=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=/tC90LPFEzIO4AzWVYwsWGBWaIbNQmziGBvemyZAVOA=; b=DbZYNoWhaxLCCV7oUtk/e8z0IqGmNq3rTCpAcUQX0pBB0hgVGTFFZ7cmGizHED+1Um N6llanBZjjuIL7PlPDm35qr/uhwuTKBUeblcDO5oCDh15SbS3jd87lGNXnqOHiEYggpl e0doHJXqQGfzq0dab1kiDpoJS05rVLxPmPeZnAG4USP0m1vchVxNlJxdg0ZPwX4zV7uQ s4+OXVpEWapgYzb/L3mIH+Fcs5m/b+A0gG5lErfshY9wRuCt3c7PX8Svq/t2HKGa4/AX YqSKPMebfMYCc/W1uvRIMegEeny2rwLqA5lCysW6bD3eEwk6jqyMbXUCVxab4l9EsJ5R hRfw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2a1V8mbuDRytdtpHyDvg7NBWg8uC4GrJ8mDTHDZRtk1cU8eT4H 3X4eLRpGscIHjdJSRbVA84Xb0tsoPpTyUQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7Sra8zl24j9Bpz+jw3knvh3aiT1TseKDzgiwuik0uUdDOV4gGxH183MyRn31dGL3WeYG+TSA==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5710:0:b0:343:5fa9:b707 with SMTP id 16-20020ac85710000000b003435fa9b707mr14787273qtw.192.1660589972462; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 11:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2600:4040:253b:7300:2d36:572:27b6:ff80]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s30-20020a05622a1a9e00b0031d283f4c4dsm8946292qtc.60.2022.08.15.11.59.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Aug 2022 11:59:31 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
In-Reply-To: <7F63BACF-576E-437C-B90F-0DFA1027369C@vigilsec.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 14:59:30 -0400
Cc: LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C8F97D05-8873-44F6-B76D-6FA84C3DEC24@sn3rd.com>
References: <PH0PR00MB10003EC6A096FE0A363BBFB9F5459@PH0PR00MB1000.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <PH0PR00MB10002A7A2850A1333B4F6C00F54A9@PH0PR00MB1000.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <7F63BACF-576E-437C-B90F-0DFA1027369C@vigilsec.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/_J4T5Y0bZZRi7vU4CqLsn3_38Bk>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Call for adoption of draft-turner-lamps-nist-pqc-kem-certificates
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 19:00:10 -0000

Support adoption. Willing to co-author. (I am a little biased.)

spt

> On Aug 15, 2022, at 09:53, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
> There has been some discussion of https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-turner-lamps-nist-pqc-kem-certificates/.  During the discussion at IETF 114, it was agreed that a separate document would be written for each NIST PQC algorithm.  As a result, this document will cover CRYSTALS-KYBER.
> 
> Should the LAMPS WG adopt “Algorithm Identifiers for NIST's PQC Algorithms for Use in the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure” in draft-turner-lamps-nist-pqc-kem-certificates-01?
> 
> Please reply to this message by Monday, 29 August 2022 to voice your support or opposition to adoption.
> 
> On behalf of the LAMPS WG Chairs,
> Russ
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm