IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Proposed charter update regarding clarifications

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 18 September 2019 18:51 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78D23120B88 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 11:51:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aQ7JpCPfJEUg for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 11:51:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3DBD120988 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 11:51:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050093.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id x8IImfjw030320; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 19:51:25 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=k61OvYHfR09ql1GadnPZx1+S9WAzm4IEcd0I3V6Oa8U=; b=Vs+2UHltL+xms4lOYdDz1OwgxNYNilJ/wadbEioA2JenSpHqVbxixLIgITrRRpaxat5o JO1n3i28IeVLvXVRx112PSShPUtC1zcV5hy6h2mR5HiWttS0ZHn6HbREoL21bDPaUb5Z UFf3cfNVylh2E24ymc3vY4nBf/EFyT/Wk8dNmHXX8UQwdz8WWyjSwlujwbg/QzUB7RQt L9cTscVeKKBL2FK+bzoNjbyHvv81BTHgRRYDYFQcWwgKPIoaMC27PpjFCD1Di27HLtLm ugcXSmXvNIbu+80NH6lmYSwl1dB1Tu0ezqkRqlPvq3e5NAIMZkm8wDbxhQInT2Ba310p 6Q==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [184.51.33.19] (may be forged)) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2v37vxmm1j-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 18 Sep 2019 19:51:25 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x8IImYMG032694; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 14:51:24 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.57]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2v37rmvvab-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 18 Sep 2019 14:51:23 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 14:51:23 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.005; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 14:51:23 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lamps] Proposed charter update regarding clarifications
Thread-Index: AQHVaNWYHZSuA5tlj0WLxrBDDES3RacyFRgA//+9XQA=
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 18:51:22 +0000
Message-ID: <35FF4CD6-D84C-4B76-BFA8-F2015A916636@akamai.com>
References: <3DB1B550-26FA-4F93-8CFA-434C1F8811D1@vigilsec.com> <F40D7FDE-207C-4CE0-8DFA-AAC1015CAA7A@vigilsec.com> <B36ACC93-B68D-4908-93BD-7FF1A19D378F@isara.com>
In-Reply-To: <B36ACC93-B68D-4908-93BD-7FF1A19D378F@isara.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1d.0.190908
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.35.23]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_35FF4CD6D84C4B76BFA8F2015A916636akamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-09-18_09:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=922 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1909180164
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.70,1.0.8 definitions=2019-09-18_09:2019-09-18,2019-09-18 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=940 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1011 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1908290000 definitions=main-1909180164
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/_JgcOqW46vBfwR02CionXoJKC0k>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Proposed charter update regarding clarifications
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 18:51:31 -0000

I think I commented before, but have no blocking issues with the new text

On 2019-09-11, 3:18 PM, "Spasm on behalf of Russ Housley" <spasm-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:spasm-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of housley@vigilsec.com<mailto:housley@vigilsec.com>> wrote:

I am concerned that we have heard from very few people on this topic, with roughly equal numbers speaking for, against, and indifferent.  If you have not spoken, please do so.


Off-topic: since we changed the name of the WG to avoid giving offense, it sure would be nice if we could change the name of the mailing list.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email