Re: [lamps] CAA tags

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Tue, 19 December 2017 14:54 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB87126FB3 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 06:54:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0rVNpcD8g2os for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 06:54:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 587C01241FC for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 06:54:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D16BE39; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 14:53:59 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hqh_TJvHS2sw; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 14:53:59 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [134.226.36.93] (bilbo.dsg.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.36.93]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F0307BE2F; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 14:53:58 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1513695239; bh=8Aqfk0ppwzVgk0lSscW9PdGVlPWyiVDRNdBvD8esA2c=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=H+tqovBSBudtzYnfYyI+UbxvDFjiQF8qFgPba/wmaWQ1stjUH7YpvApLuY1axXw8U 58jssmSt3CNlywkDptuJ44Ji861WnveudNbW3s9XBKPaJV4WNVab8twRVlfLdB4xzx Q9iC4NqgViB3FUn19XsfpgQSaNU7tLy+jhWlbOX8=
To: Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek@digicert.com>
Cc: "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>
References: <DM5PR14MB1289FA2B76543ABAF16FD0EF830E0@DM5PR14MB1289.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <0ab8efa3-378c-ece7-4fa3-913308f81c22@eff.org> <DM5PR14MB12895320D99FC570E797373F830E0@DM5PR14MB1289.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <CAErg=HGMOVmvEoD=hy3rnTb=J1uQeu-SHrTn1JEeRnQuXzqg-Q@mail.gmail.com> <DM5PR14MB1289520C260D1634FBF5C1E4830E0@DM5PR14MB1289.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <ca3d070f-2fb1-32e2-f6d4-70a7809525a8@cs.tcd.ie> <DM5PR14MB12893477D1F843E48CD3D088830F0@DM5PR14MB1289.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <b22edb33-2279-bfe9-035c-dd0e10b1212c@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 14:53:57 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <DM5PR14MB12893477D1F843E48CD3D088830F0@DM5PR14MB1289.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SVMhPh4l3COgcjdO1SeL0mwrBhCmvPnXd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/aWHwFEaJJprM7kw3BgUPOSBMX_w>
Subject: Re: [lamps] CAA tags
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 14:54:03 -0000


On 19/12/17 14:47, Tim Hollebeek wrote:
> If you don't want to use these tags, you don't have to.  They're
> purely optional and completely backwards compatible.  They simply
> transmit additional information to the CA about the desired
> certificate.

Great, as long as that stays the same, I'm happy to
go back to watching from the side-lines:-)

Thanks,
S.