IETF Logo Mail Archive

[lamps] Re: Mohamed Boucadair's Discuss on draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 12 May 2025 12:32 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: spasm@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: spasm@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B6992786A87; Mon, 12 May 2025 05:32:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LMWKpVC-ikhX; Mon, 12 May 2025 05:32:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FFEB2786A7F; Mon, 12 May 2025 05:32:11 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: relay.sandelman.ca; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=sandelman.ca header.i=@sandelman.ca header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dyas header.b=ddxyQg1e; dkim-atps=neutral
Received: from dyas.sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:64:42:2b79:ea9c:f8c2:dee5]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44BC11F4A3; Mon, 12 May 2025 12:32:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3E245AF65A; Mon, 12 May 2025 13:32:08 +0100 (BST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=sandelman.ca; s=dyas; t=1747053128; bh=4qMtcqsIvH2M1LOaclqIXRKPElyIy4CjUoY2uxDAvPs=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-reply-to:References:Date:From; b=ddxyQg1eNHmVD6ApZ1p4vbjyQn1qBQMspGMG+s8xo8chyO7ivO1dmucGRrTmsJB0i gsjYXrmIh+UEMMEEdS508NaafgfnPLonKXsZ2bUu9cJvk2iJbhS2v41f2wDDrHjraX Rz9mJNQNKKemFMo6rhm0H2fn30P5830PghQ4Ps3B3DZiecBv9LAzx93X/WAJ11Vtxx EoNEaVM0MhrH3cu9EVDdrZ2KCjNb8MsnG6Kf1xEkkAxmvsQlt6hCC+FRl0Pc8qnuMG T2I3pV8UlqHvUvTp3fgcxe+2QKlFZsKrg/vMzhOfilGbn/UH2Tkj8WO7ZDt5x8j3Y4 kLL93aK7HHBKg==
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
In-reply-to: <MR1PPF6395AA9E6AA12FDEFF1C1FB3C14EC8897A@MR1PPF6395AA9E6.FRAP264.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <174651635815.664864.12648748464955509992@dt-datatracker-58d4498dbd-6gzjf> <1236692.1746572390@dyas> <MR1PPF6395AA9E608A992685AAB478483AC8888A@MR1PPF6395AA9E6.FRAP264.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <1359391.1746704645@dyas> <MR1PPF6395AA9E6AA12FDEFF1C1FB3C14EC8897A@MR1PPF6395AA9E6.FRAP264.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Comments: In-reply-to mohamed.boucadair@orange.com message dated "Mon, 12 May 2025 05:31:49 -0000."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 13:32:08 +0100
Message-ID: <1778026.1747053128@dyas>
Message-ID-Hash: 2EFZ24BUK4ATP6UZJQBNPD24AEAS56CE
X-Message-ID-Hash: 2EFZ24BUK4ATP6UZJQBNPD24AEAS56CE
X-MailFrom: mcr@sandelman.ca
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-spasm.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs@ietf.org>, "lamps-chairs@ietf.org" <lamps-chairs@ietf.org>, "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>, "housley@vigilsec.com" <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [lamps] Re: Mohamed Boucadair's Discuss on draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
List-Id: This is the mail list for the LAMPS Working Group <spasm.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/b2XBt1fGYXtux6KFo0ub0m_9B2Y>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:spasm-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:spasm-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:spasm-leave@ietf.org>

mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote:
    > As I wanted to clear my DISCUSS, I checked diff 22 vs. 20 and I think that need to fix this one in Section 3.3 as well:

    > CURRENT:
    > [1] {
    > SEQUENCE {
    > OBJECT IDENTIFIER id-extensionReqTemplate
    > (1 2 840 113549 1 9 TBD3)

I fixed this to id-aa-extensionReqTemplate
David: is there a source (der) for this example?

    > Some nits I noticed when checking the diff, fwiw:

    > * There several pending notes: "(TODO remove: Example ref Harkins0*)"

Yes, I'd like to leave this here until later, because we have made a few
mistakes where we fixed the wrong example.

    > * s/additional tinformation/additional information

I saw this typo in the diff, and already fixed it.

I will post a -23 on Wednesday, unless I hear unanimous view to post it now.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-                      *I*LIKE*TRAINS*

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status