Re: [lamps] The LAMPS WG has placed draft-hoffman-andrews-caa-simplification in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org> Tue, 27 February 2018 22:59 UTC

Return-Path: <jsha@eff.org>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DD6B12E8C3 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:59:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eff.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dD_oZj4jozpT for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:59:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail2.eff.org (mail2.eff.org [173.239.79.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A70DB12E8C2 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:59:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eff.org; s=mail2; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version: Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=aIWfGq9FF68NyMpaPtULdqM9yChf5vGKyuE0dw6IhvQ=; b=IbszbyVF0ceb4t6rjhixAHh6dZ +9F8qAmSVoQpc4ftKrb2CvT0rsn2YxKecha2FaKMPQZ3ZSSwv/tbxBaPZP3hpYhpIG5UoiusXGHOa khym3QFQ6pYTqolT8eE3ftNbvSuEMhamP0OuRIJjQOiQ5FK3/Q/WVxGj9qR9AUehSFW0=;
Received: ; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:59:29 -0800
To: Corey Bonnell <CBonnell@trustwave.com>, Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek@digicert.com>, "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>
References: <151950039671.13803.5548300357689455000.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <MWHPR14MB1376ABAA3A2ADE2383B90BF283C10@MWHPR14MB1376.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <bb6b0378-2d5d-f0f1-4070-b8c506d4ec86@eff.org> <7D9F4BE0-4760-4191-846F-3DA8511C9F03@trustwave.com>
From: Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org>
Message-ID: <398b4cb4-4a58-c134-c08f-03589f0639e6@eff.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:59:29 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7D9F4BE0-4760-4191-846F-3DA8511C9F03@trustwave.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/b4BkPQ5wxPYddo1fqRSKhw7pfMQ>
Subject: Re: [lamps] The LAMPS WG has placed draft-hoffman-andrews-caa-simplification in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 22:59:32 -0000

On 02/27/2018 12:20 PM, Corey Bonnell wrote:
> Hi Jacob,
> I have a few minor changes I'd like to make to the grammar I proposed a few months ago, namely to add support for whitespace surrounding the equals sign in parameter tag/value pairs as well as to allow for hyphens to appear in parameter tags (this is necessary to support the parameter names proposed in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-acme-caa-03):
>
> issuevalue = *WSP [domain] *WSP [";" *WSP [parameters] *WSP]
>
> domain = label *("." label)
> label = (ALPHA / DIGIT) *( *("-") (ALPHA / DIGIT))
>
> parameters = (parameter *WSP “;” *WSP parameters) / parameter
> parameter = tag *WSP "=" *WSP value
> tag = (ALPHA / DIGIT) *( *("-") (ALPHA / DIGIT))
> value = *(%x21-3A / %x3C-7E)
>
> I used the same production rule value for "tag" that currently exists for "label" to allow for hyphens in the parameter tag, but didn't combine them so that we can continue to use the descriptive rule names of "tag" and "label" as opposed to something potentially confusing like "tag-or-label".
>
> For the purposes of getting this incorporated into RFC 6844-bis (or RFC 6844-bis-bis), should I create an erratum, or is this email sufficient?
This email is sufficient, thanks.