Re: [lamps] Proposed addition of header protection to the LAMPS charter

Bernie Hoeneisen <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch> Fri, 21 December 2018 14:48 UTC

Return-Path: <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89F14123FFD for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 06:48:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xcxM7e0r6JHe for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 06:48:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from softronics.hoeneisen.ch (softronics.hoeneisen.ch [62.2.86.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28FC4126CC7 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 06:48:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by softronics.hoeneisen.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch>) id 1gaM6J-0008H4-BE; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 15:48:31 +0100
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 15:48:31 +0100
From: Bernie Hoeneisen <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch>
X-X-Sender: bhoeneis@softronics.hoeneisen.ch
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
cc: LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
In-Reply-To: <DD949886-DE26-4B88-B8BB-474025F07ABD@vigilsec.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1812211545390.882@softronics.hoeneisen.ch>
References: <DC188C55-6FDE-4E64-9151-54815E96B50B@vigilsec.com> <87bm5hxdn0.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1812211039240.882@softronics.hoeneisen.ch> <6C7FBB0D-1146-4DE8-AA56-76B0586C8807@vigilsec.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1812211422000.882@softronics.hoeneisen.ch> <DD949886-DE26-4B88-B8BB-474025F07ABD@vigilsec.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on softronics.hoeneisen.ch); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/b8D5dl71kpX3mB68LhR5GTBliVo>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Proposed addition of header protection to the LAMPS charter
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 14:48:38 -0000

Hi Russ

Thanks for the clarifications on my process question. All clear now.

Merry Xmas!

cheers
  Bernie

--

http://ucom.ch/
Modern Telephony Solutions and Tech Consulting for Internet Technology


On Fri, 21 Dec 2018, Russ Housley wrote:

> Bernie:
>>
>> I am aware of the charter update discussion regarding header protection.
>>
>> However, I am not aware that a concrete text for the charter update has already been (officially) proposed. In DKG's recent email to this list it looks like that there is an existing proposal, and DKG suggests a amend to this (in form of a diff). This is where my confusion is routed.
>>
>> So, do I understand you correctly, that officially no concrete text for charter update has been proposed yet (for discussion)?
>
> No.  I am saying that DKG is offering this text for discussion as the next step.  Please review and comment.
>
>> Are the chairs (or ADs) actually about to submit a proposal to the list to trigger the discussion or will it be the other way around?
>
> Once the WG discussion is complete, the ADs will put it in the Datatracker and discuss it on a telechat.
>
> Russ
>
>