IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Call for adoption of draft-vangeest-x509-hash-sigs-03

Jonathan Hammell <jfhamme.cccs@gmail.com> Fri, 12 April 2019 01:32 UTC

Return-Path: <jfhamme.cccs@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 036751200B6 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 18:32:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Io7CXXk-XPBL for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 18:32:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x534.google.com (mail-ed1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::534]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8BC41200A4 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 18:32:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x534.google.com with SMTP id s39so6904923edb.2 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 18:32:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=NTlyO4HEzC9UDuNzIN5Z+cv8cVbgfK2k6fKRrFboTdU=; b=aZnlBPwt8qnqutiWhEGD4nHCPVLudtVUdi4Ro+ZzWa+kpPFg1mdsamVSSgTedSqfoJ v2xt6Zozkc9yKRdY28Jl2buArtWMd8EWicOqypSTZJww0HLRlxZ4QhuNHaT5o1zfAohC 6AOlBkXQjZFut31963FTgoqaBrbUakvb6nrintlj+QH5eBIYzEmpKGHM3D2F6sHb80I/ Iz/T3xt0g4ZWXHd5U+2L7s20NSQdWNb4BsYVcq6pNCk+/BOqmxKKAPnF+Vb/uFdQEjrF Qj8uKAxuHcENbHJCsV1TYXztLsFevBB/JfhncOb6HJ/bmvLqf20qYe6b9VTAu95R6TMp WmGg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=NTlyO4HEzC9UDuNzIN5Z+cv8cVbgfK2k6fKRrFboTdU=; b=G/PzCjA7iygXg5oWCvryYSrvaWSqpKl+jnjd9RZ5AomIXEa5v3LFLbbHblMlg5R3Jj j0BHmWZRe6RG/KqkWDllJKHmKubxh0KXU21FzLAa1WS+uzPM+VhUX5MiMQozH0U7fDbX V9R95k0urYnonWOh+b5mYI8tc22QANKDBcMYWeWGowFzxe2DizhumVF4nDjsrH4xrB1f 4gHazU57KXVx/7T+oO5xPof30UnRS+nhxvIphnfu2zpZqgY1MRLIQdNZFRd/yvK///Dl IEcgc+KDkhRVz9eNqoApLV0+tftULma9RMXauz6UrbufQHebnASq4TAQUlV4a2ai+b2d 3YOg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXtUxU78Jr+HSaRFnqzZl1BJlRwzSj1XlVL+vQEuWhh9qDgFTl5 bxtAmyDCHQ7Zr8RhrLFxSdSPWKv/DZL8Chd2fZ/Y+Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzhJuS3N/te/Rl4DDVBwtKj6COM5JbgutzAl8TXbnXDRp9DmhgSXHvio+XpzZz+gkvdmoW4UO18LaKLJNOmp3s=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:e610:: with SMTP id y16mr32186034edm.67.1555032741945; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 18:32:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Jonathan Hammell <jfhamme.cccs@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 21:32:10 -0400
Message-ID: <CALhKWgg8jbpX_R_qg1DAZPBuGc=Swr0EXFuiSqZSmYQpfL=cag@mail.gmail.com>
To: spasm@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000032a5eb05864b46b9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/bV2eyER1CMfg_eYgJCElf9tVoPk>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Call for adoption of draft-vangeest-x509-hash-sigs-03
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 01:32:26 -0000

I support adoption of this draft.

Much research has been done on how to handle the state of private key in
HSMs in a fail-safe manner.

Jonathan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email