Re: [lamps] The LAMPS WG has placed draft-hoffman-andrews-caa-simplification in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek@digicert.com> Mon, 26 February 2018 21:01 UTC

Return-Path: <tim.hollebeek@digicert.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B959212711E; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 13:01:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=digicert.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WwZWWNDAW-Ob; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 13:01:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1.bemta12.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta12.messagelabs.com [216.82.251.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC6D012711A; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 13:01:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [216.82.251.38] (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits)) by server-12.bemta-12.messagelabs.com id 12/4B-09148-1C5749A5; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 21:01:53 +0000
X-Brightmail-Tracker: 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 f5ncXLZff6dUtjV6YsFMeuD1XgpIT66jklKzbVXbi/al5T3vDkdRkZZ5ft0fze3CjsVN6NSPNPBZJ+OHI7v3nJA19L8pUj+2J6awy7Awv/8D9oA8OG0VP4hNnu1Vy+nfxLWk1+LG5Iv1WoZxWLlLqAcSrSZ8gVLS75AwAA
X-Env-Sender: tim.hollebeek@digicert.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-16.tower-163.messagelabs.com!1519678912!152446813!1
X-Originating-IP: [216.32.180.48]
X-SYMC-ESS-Client-Auth: mailfrom-relay-check=pass
X-StarScan-Received:
X-StarScan-Version: 9.9.13; banners=-,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 130926 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2018 21:01:52 -0000
Received: from mail-by2nam03lp0048.outbound.protection.outlook.com (HELO NAM03-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) (216.32.180.48) by server-16.tower-163.messagelabs.com with AES256-SHA256 encrypted SMTP; 26 Feb 2018 21:01:52 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=digicert.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=FrdyTQKvQDwYvsCs/uOR76DnjoebvndTNZuwgIPowfw=; b=O8uJTOXEjJNEEVgGhv0aqXAbMmjT91/laRHtOYphDq7Kz5Sj8a/Pa0KTaHvkBUTS8g3Jsy+e7pnFDtTYcAPfOVN3HTgQSW/79pGbwfYaCqtZEQE1FvEf/IstdOb4GWTyc7V3yFZnEvItEHRnIfnZ0hzLwEI/27n5gt1sG9HdESA=
Received: from MWHPR14MB1376.namprd14.prod.outlook.com (10.173.232.139) by MWHPR14MB1456.namprd14.prod.outlook.com (10.173.233.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.527.15; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 21:01:50 +0000
Received: from MWHPR14MB1376.namprd14.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::7929:3f48:4a4f:1e32]) by MWHPR14MB1376.namprd14.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::7929:3f48:4a4f:1e32%18]) with mapi id 15.20.0527.021; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 21:01:50 +0000
From: Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek@digicert.com>
To: Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org>, IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>, "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>, "lamps-chairs@ietf.org" <lamps-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-hoffman-andrews-caa-simplification@ietf.org" <draft-hoffman-andrews-caa-simplification@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lamps] The LAMPS WG has placed draft-hoffman-andrews-caa-simplification in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
Thread-Index: AQHTraVorrf6N5rdb0qHBxrDXKeE/KO2wt9AgABLMACAACAQ4A==
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 21:01:50 +0000
Message-ID: <MWHPR14MB1376E403056436836E3F888283C10@MWHPR14MB1376.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
References: <151950039671.13803.5548300357689455000.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <MWHPR14MB1376ABAA3A2ADE2383B90BF283C10@MWHPR14MB1376.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <bb6b0378-2d5d-f0f1-4070-b8c506d4ec86@eff.org>
In-Reply-To: <bb6b0378-2d5d-f0f1-4070-b8c506d4ec86@eff.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [50.196.75.174]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; MWHPR14MB1456; 7:zbRMCsK9duGF2lxt3hVWXMsXyonDHKGRgMNLxqmPAqM5bi2DsZYfwBbR6Q/aSxFT7u3/yOnXA3KAaJPRN+S1xZneSKytO8x1qCuHYr1l8Az3M4Rh3mMl05djQXQkPBbWBWsAAeLqemrUWaL1m5XT5sHLy/TQoJRiA/2JcKsJQa1yz6uOI8uBj133RGHz7PAcCDfLUMxCZEgDGHyBWoFlD6+ESMNXLAHNzGIXjI/2Hf3PmAPk+2e50RnEFMFn/4Ek
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 096789ce-775b-4dde-4292-08d57d5c2822
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(7021125)(4534165)(7022125)(4603075)(4627221)(201702281549075)(7048125)(7024125)(7027125)(7028125)(7023125)(5600026)(4604075)(3008032)(2017052603307)(7153060)(49563074)(7193020); SRVR:MWHPR14MB1456;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MWHPR14MB1456:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MWHPR14MB14565C44B4301BD1071B228283C10@MWHPR14MB1456.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(102415395)(6040501)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(93006095)(93001095)(10201501046)(3231220)(944501161)(52105095)(6041288)(20161123564045)(2016111802025)(20161123558120)(20161123562045)(20161123560045)(6043046)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:MWHPR14MB1456; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:MWHPR14MB1456;
x-forefront-prvs: 05954A7C45
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(376002)(366004)(39380400002)(396003)(346002)(39860400002)(13464003)(189003)(199004)(186003)(5250100002)(106356001)(6506007)(6436002)(53546011)(7696005)(68736007)(8676002)(97736004)(478600001)(76176011)(6116002)(86362001)(81156014)(3280700002)(81166006)(2201001)(3660700001)(2906002)(8936002)(229853002)(6246003)(55016002)(53936002)(3846002)(99936001)(5660300001)(25786009)(74316002)(305945005)(7736002)(316002)(14454004)(110136005)(2950100002)(33656002)(2501003)(9686003)(102836004)(26005)(99286004)(2900100001)(66066001)(105586002)(19400905002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:MWHPR14MB1456; H:MWHPR14MB1376.namprd14.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: digicert.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: edprh/d/DIavXdfMegien6ekje9LtQn4GEtlU/+/U7G8aMYNpY0RtsopVny7SzUcCy2yylC63eHAenD2FV6QC9XNzJh7YyNAykFJpr9diObxWUVY05akafOKLAaR2N/UIIJ5svxmgJiQJnbSLRsz2K44ma+a/w2ZINEEtPQeK0Q=
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=2.16.840.1.101.3.4.2.1; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0170_01D3AF0A.5771DCD0"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: digicert.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 096789ce-775b-4dde-4292-08d57d5c2822
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 26 Feb 2018 21:01:50.5027 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: cf813fa1-bde5-4e75-9479-f6aaa8b1f284
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MWHPR14MB1456
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/clH_4_MyR8Vp8yfb4Fu3OHxegvg>
Subject: Re: [lamps] The LAMPS WG has placed draft-hoffman-andrews-caa-simplification in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 21:01:56 -0000

Ok.  I just want to make sure it gets in soon.  Having a grammar that's
incorrect
is a pretty serious issue.  Corey and I can help support the effort if that
helps
keep things moving.

I'd support getting RFC 6844bis out on an expedited timeline, since some of
the
errors in RFC 6844 are so serious.  If we end up with a RFC6844bisbis later,
so be it.

-Tim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jacob Hoffman-Andrews [mailto:jsha@eff.org]
> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 12:05 PM
> To: Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek@digicert.com>om>; IETF Secretariat <ietf-
> secretariat-reply@ietf.org>gt;; spasm@ietf.org; lamps-chairs@ietf.org; draft-
> hoffman-andrews-caa-simplification@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [lamps] The LAMPS WG has placed draft-hoffman-andrews-caa-
> simplification in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
> 
> On 02/26/2018 06:46 AM, Tim Hollebeek wrote:
> > the RFC 6844 grammar contradicts the examples.  Corey had an excellent
> > proposed fix for this issue.  It should probably be incorporated.
> I tried to incorporate changes based on the thread Corey started, but
wound up
> deciding it was better to have something to adopt sooner rather than
later.
> Definitely happy to continue to work on those changes in parallel with the
call
> for adoption. Assuming the draft gets adopted as a WG work product, it's
easy
> enough to land the changes on the WG draft.