Re: [lamps] DRAFT Agenda for LAMPS Session at IETF 101

[Russ Housley <[e-mail]>]

Alex:

Maybe.  I am willing to add an "if time permits" section to the agenda.  The topics that are part of the WG charter must take priority.  Topics that have been discussed on the mail list will be placed on the agenda before ones that have not been discussed. 

Russ


> Alexander Truskovsky <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> I’ve uploaded a proposed draft on pq hybrid x509 certificates, but haven’t seen any notifications on the mailing list.
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-truskovsky-lamps-pq-hybrid-x509/
> 
> I was wondering if there is any time available to briefly present it during the LAMPS session.
> 
> Regards,
> Alex
> 
> 
> On 2018-02-22, 1:18 PM, "Spasm on behalf of Russ Housley" <[e-mail] on behalf of [e-mail]> wrote:
> 
>    Please review and comment.
> 
>    The authors tell me that there will be an Internet-Draft for rfc6844bis before the cut-off date for IETF 101.
> 
>    Russ
> 
>    = = = = = = = = = =
> 
>    LAMPS WG Agenda
> 
>    0)  Minute Taker, Jabber Scribe, Bluesheets
>    1)  Agenda Bash
>    2)  Documents in the RFC Editor's Queue
>        a)  draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5280-i18n-update
>        b)  draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses
>    3)  Documents that have been sent to the IESG
>        a)  draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5750-bis (Jim)
>        b)  draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5751-bis (Jim)
>    4)  Active Working Group Documents
>        a)  rfc6844bis (Jacob and Phillip)
>        b)  draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake (Panos and Quynh)
>        c)  draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes (Quynh and Panos)
>    5)  Wrap Up