From nobody Fri Oct 8 09:40:57 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610783A07EC for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 09:40:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.896 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FDP1YL1p9IPw for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 09:40:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5E563A07D0 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 09:40:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E1E300C57 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:40:51 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id omyIHPKNEVal for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:40:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.161] (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C3EAD300B19; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:40:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Russ Housley Message-Id: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A0741DAB-BDD4-4D1C-8D17-683E021CF391" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\)) Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:40:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: Cc: "spasm@ietf.org" , John Gray , David von Oheimb To: "Brockhaus, Hendrik" References: <8D6D333A-14A3-4487-967F-CFCAC22D856C@vigilsec.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [lamps] [EXTERNAL] Re: [CMP Updates] Requesting a current CRL X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2021 16:40:55 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_A0741DAB-BDD4-4D1C-8D17-683E021CF391 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > On Oct 8, 2021, at 12:36 PM, Brockhaus, Hendrik = wrote: >=20 > My question is, is it OK to reuse id-it-currentCrl together with = id-it-crlThisUpdate like this >=20 > GenMsg: {id-it 6}, < absent > > GenRep: {id-it 6}, CertificateList | < absent > Yes, because is exactly the same response that would be given = if {id-it 6} is unrecognized by the server. Russ= --Apple-Mail=_A0741DAB-BDD4-4D1C-8D17-683E021CF391 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

On Oct 8, 2021, at 12:36 PM, Brockhaus, Hendrik <hendrik.brockhaus@siemens.com> wrote:

My question is, is it OK to = reuse id-it-currentCrl together with id-it-crlThisUpdate like = this

   GenMsg:    {id-it 6}, < = absent >
   GenRep:    {id-it 6}, = CertificateList  |  < absent = >

Yes, = because <absent> is exactly the same response that would be given = if {id-it 6} is unrecognized by the server.

Russ
= --Apple-Mail=_A0741DAB-BDD4-4D1C-8D17-683E021CF391--