Re: [lamps] Magnus Westerlund's Block on charter-ietf-lamps-04-02: (with BLOCK)

[Russ Housley <[e-mail]>]

> On Dec 5, 2019, at 9:48 AM, Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Magnus Westerlund has entered the following ballot position for
> charter-ietf-lamps-04-02: Block
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-lamps/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> BLOCK:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Regarding:
> 
> The LAMPS WG may produce
> clarifications where needed, but the LAMPS WG shall not adopt
> anything beyond clarifications without rechartering.
> 
> ... may produce clarifications ...
> 
> I would argue that this allows for updates specifications that doesn't change
> the scope of the specification. Some clarifications may result in a actual
> change of a prior WG consensus decision. If that is what is intended, then
> fine. But I would appreciate some clarification on what type of work is
> actually expected here.

There is not intent to change previous consensus.  In Singapore, these were discussed as likely work:

  - draft-richardson-lamps-rfc7030est-clarify
  - draft-turner-5480-ku-clarifications
  - draft-housley-lamps-cms-update-alg-id-protect

I'm not sure how you want to constrain the charter beyond clarifications.

Russ