IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8649 (5863)

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Tue, 24 September 2019 18:36 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCDE91208BF for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:36:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HB0d37UDidTe for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:36:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B84D1208A6 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:36:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id x8OIaB8x017203 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 24 Sep 2019 14:36:13 -0400
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:36:10 -0700
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek@digicert.com>
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "housley@vigilsec.com" <housley@vigilsec.com>, "rdd@cert.org" <rdd@cert.org>, "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>, "nay486028@gmail.com" <nay486028@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20190924183610.GE6424@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <20190924174350.35F53B80836@rfc-editor.org> <3C3C5B32-8858-4699-BC27-D0BA79AC3CAE@akamai.com> <MWHPR14MB14565EF40A8C8319BC87B50583840@MWHPR14MB1456.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR14MB14565EF40A8C8319BC87B50583840@MWHPR14MB1456.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/elWNwcQoy7KpMSyxFCqG4-3AnvE>
Subject: Re: [lamps] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8649 (5863)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:36:27 -0000

The RFC Editor can just delete reports like this.

-Ben

On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 06:29:47PM +0000, Tim Hollebeek wrote:
> I had the same reaction.
> 
> -Tim
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 2:03 PM
> > To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>; housley@vigilsec.com;
> > rdd@cert.org; kaduk@mit.edu; Tim Hollebeek
> > <tim.hollebeek@digicert.com>
> > Cc: spasm@ietf.org; nay486028@gmail.com
> > Subject: Re: [lamps] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8649 (5863)
> >
> > I am not sure what this errata is trying to say, but the "Grammer" is 
> > spelled
> > wrong.
> > I guess this should be closed?
> >
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email