Re: [Spasm] WG Review: Some PKIX and SMIME (spasm)
Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Wed, 29 June 2016 13:57 UTC
Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B2212B030 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 06:57:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.727
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.727 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x9HKrSuNzOt0 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 06:57:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A9EA12DE21 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 06:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 868BABE5D; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 14:57:48 +0100 (IST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uZGij-yK6f3K; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 14:57:48 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [134.226.36.93] (bilbo.dsg.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.36.93]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CC715BE5B; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 14:57:47 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1467208668; bh=GxESSDgEa0spqESbOmPQaXpUwGZ54Vl7fTrTXZn4qEk=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=B8dcF3T3QTPWchNnXRbFHcrMq4L+x9LFdoFn3aZGt2xRvLXmrjMcjtbn37gpGLU5E yp8tc2ud5jP1EGXC6OyFd33MxCGBIvAM/tndmKK0/DkXPRReweYxRISajYkLJrCRCf OFVJKptYQETZ5PIipYex9CvZ3CSFxQwER8ByQM+U=
To: Michael Jenkins <m.jenkins.364706@gmail.com>, spasm@ietf.org
References: <20160617163337.9633.3485.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <576AA1C8.1070604@cs.tcd.ie> <be97b6bc-8502-454b-9222-e3445b87de8f@seantek.com> <CAC2=hnfM_crcb6XoZNn2sbsS_5uSrVQerGOQP1MVto+31y=4Hg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <5773D3DC.6090306@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 14:57:48 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAC2=hnfM_crcb6XoZNn2sbsS_5uSrVQerGOQP1MVto+31y=4Hg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms090800050902080804050706"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/esGLkwIUwIyjgQyNxBrbcnFIEr0>
Subject: Re: [Spasm] WG Review: Some PKIX and SMIME (spasm)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 13:57:56 -0000
On 22/06/16 20:07, Michael Jenkins wrote: > lamps - Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME That's the winner! You'll see various mails on this shortly probably if the secretariat can get this changed for the Berlin agenda (which I think they can). The secretariat will migrate the mailing list without you having to do stuff, but I'm not yet sure when that'll happen. Thanks, S.
- Re: [Spasm] WG Review: Some PKIX and SMIME (spasm) Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Spasm] WG Review: Some PKIX and SMIME (spasm) Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Spasm] WG Review: Some PKIX and SMIME (spasm) Michael Jenkins
- Re: [Spasm] WG Review: Some PKIX and SMIME (spasm) Sean Leonard
- Re: [Spasm] WG Review: Some PKIX and SMIME (spasm) Stephen Farrell
- [Spasm] WG Review: Some PKIX and SMIME (spasm) The IESG