[lamps] draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5750 and draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5751

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 16 February 2018 17:27 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95CEF1270FC for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 09:27:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qIBxeA4p7VA9 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 09:27:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71E2C124C27 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 09:27:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69BE630063A for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:27:46 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net []) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 2rI03hcMGe0F for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:27:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: from a860b60074bd.home (pool-108-45-101-150.washdc.fios.verizon.net []) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F1EF3002AD; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:27:45 -0500 (EST)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Message-Id: <37C69F85-C4F2-417C-A34D-4AFF1AE5F87D@vigilsec.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:27:46 -0500
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/f3U8czrMopPJrdNgPMSbqWq_kfc>
Subject: [lamps] draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5750 and draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5751
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 17:27:50 -0000


These two documents are both waiting on updates to resolve comments from the AD Review.  Can this happen before the end of February?