IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] CMPv2/LightWeiight-CMP profile over CoAP transport

Mohit Sahni <mohit06jan@gmail.com> Fri, 05 June 2020 00:06 UTC

Return-Path: <mohit06jan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A04E33A1097 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 17:06:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id noGvtpMhCiNy for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 17:06:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2c.google.com (mail-io1-xd2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EC003A1096 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 17:06:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2c.google.com with SMTP id r2so8397882ioo.4 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 17:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Fre2DPsnThD4bhMz5APX9cH1NB7pcU3HrtAeSVrxrng=; b=iZGYFDPnFJdEmh6IyRjqST1QgBj4scnYj4R/DS4mIt+ZN6g+iTHh5M5eQF2+OFL1Tk JrHA1VdNF6OYGiuERh2b/86U6gfZYTJfLegysJ04qt7oNtQW+efjymjU1cBJHaThsps5 0bA/hFu0yFcB2b8r7uK+4xcrZPi7y+E3Q3ZltnC/YXtscSp4rJHMTnhcr4+ErXOB58wk 96VGztdLUBQel3LwoUucWuKvjJq/Ymbe50hEkpW1UVE2WRss01g1Ih9OPStLltfn5CsJ h/ONvHwDIJJdmO+JOX0bIDECnbeyqvXA0F2QiB6ExP0yRT+fYLx/Dr+PG0kW5q0kL3uv XuDg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Fre2DPsnThD4bhMz5APX9cH1NB7pcU3HrtAeSVrxrng=; b=ofEbni2N2p1Xe3gwVuLOVbgtAe4bjDEbpvqgGAdFp+rm696gQPr/aZ38Sb1QCprkk3 Vf7SAk1LuY8YdCrVXPkhxbPV2CrOYVwxlPaWF9Y0vOUsEB/qSrWaCDL3bXZ2uUnJhLar XIUAJBDxA105U2/TW1OuowyqI15fKHIInz6qN6zvOfwhBwAU5nu1vrqkVkF/9gaNiO1g vdAJjnDa0+cxM3RTbInotRrwDH7KkrzTMPEJSwN6mxcG7gR4CK4ihnNLbw75xQHFOSvN lAXTBNOTWmqJH+38a62D3gk7EVM1XRccVqjbJ4B7Gk33lOWzwZ+yD9Dthbljf5GCQ0aD R9ww==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530H5U6wySbtPHfGCBjxAgIdGQiST2RaADJqlLJjNiO86f91c/El X4eMBeUU8YWsqczUsWDHgX5EfcMep+Lkjg3Td7s=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwZIjveQii+RxhDcKrbZ0JnZ9pCvWTOzguvx62PUHqlM7lSfHiZFJBszkNzflEA9GicqwFcedDK95KC68Ouy4U=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:2ac9:: with SMTP id m9mr6357147iov.68.1591315601233; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 17:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAEpwuw1+u8RvXmvBn5zRa2gUYKN28Joh7nfteoU+bUeyhS0HHg@mail.gmail.com> <BN7PR11MB254741EAAAB82C18ABF8B60EC9890@BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN7PR11MB254741EAAAB82C18ABF8B60EC9890@BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Mohit Sahni <mohit06jan@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 17:06:30 -0700
Message-ID: <CAEpwuw34tAq1_HkB4n_2cZU5ofWMRCq=ZexjXimQGX8LX-Et4Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)" <pkampana@cisco.com>
Cc: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>, "Brockhaus, Hendrik" <hendrik.brockhaus@siemens.com>, LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000231f6805a74b094a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/f9Qt2IwHHrCOTKCSu2KcskRT18c>
Subject: Re: [lamps] CMPv2/LightWeiight-CMP profile over CoAP transport
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 00:06:44 -0000

Panos,
I am sorry, I did not understand the first part of your comment. Can you
please elaborate on which two same protocols you are referring to here
that will work on CoAP?

-Mohit

On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 12:32 PM Panos Kampanakis (pkampana) <
pkampana@cisco.com> wrote:

> Great. We can now once again have more than one protocols that do the same
> thing over the same transport protocol.
>
>
>
> This should go in the ACE WG. ACE worked on EST-coaps
> (draft-ietf-ace-coap-est) as well.
>
>
>
> Panos
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Spasm <spasm-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Mohit Sahni
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 04, 2020 2:04 PM
> *To:* Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>; Brockhaus, Hendrik <
> hendrik.brockhaus@siemens.com>; LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* [lamps] CMPv2/LightWeiight-CMP profile over CoAP transport
>
>
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> There were some discussions about using CoAP as transport for the
> Lightweight CMP profile in the last LAMPS WG meeting. After having some
> discussions with Hendrik, David, and Andreas I have written an
> internet-draft for using CoAP as transport for CMPv2 / Light Weight CMP
> Profile. If I am not mistaken, the recommendation was to present this draft
> to ACE WG for the review instead of Lamps group, can you please advice on
> that?
>
>
>
> Here is the link to the internet-draft that I wrote
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-msahni-tbd-cmpv2-coap-transport-00.txt
>
> Thanks
>
> Mohit
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email