IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-algorithms-07

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Tue, 28 September 2021 20:48 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FFBD3A05AA for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 13:48:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OQoCCIWI7E0u for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 13:48:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A54783A0598 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 13:48:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D01AF300BEC for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 16:48:31 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id PcVH2k29-Vvf for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 16:48:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 64BAB300BC8 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 16:48:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 16:48:28 -0400
References: <B32905CB-0582-4556-95AC-D93B885A3306@vigilsec.com>
To: LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <B32905CB-0582-4556-95AC-D93B885A3306@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <D8C350CB-786A-44C5-BA8C-E25DBD6417F9@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/fL8K30EgZRy7TTmaSpV0rKWyYZo>
Subject: Re: [lamps] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-algorithms-07
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 20:48:37 -0000

I have not seen any objections to moving forward with this document.  Due to the earlier mailing list discussion and the amount of this document that is pointers to other RFCs, I am comfortable moving forward.

I will start working on the shepherd write-up.

For the LAMPS WG Chairs,
 Russ


> On Sep 13, 2021, at 4:26 PM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
> Title: Certificate Management Protocol (CMP) Algorithms
> 
> Author: H. Brockhaus, H. Aschauer, M. Ounsworth, and J. Gray
> 
> Datatracker: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-algorithms
> 
> This document updates RFC 4210 for algorithms that are more appropriate today.  The WG Last Call will run until Tuesday, September 28th. Please review the document and respond with any comments or concerns on the mail list.
> 
> For the LAMPS WG Chairs,
> Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email