IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-08

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Tue, 25 June 2019 16:34 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18FF6120411; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:34:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=ssqHgC54; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=h9JzUy8t
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cyy_c4Ybe68a; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:34:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E81B120322; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:34:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 460D8224B4; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:34:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:34:44 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm3; bh=j v7/sP4a1Be3M47+I8oypNCVzJueFbnryTnDujE25oA=; b=ssqHgC54dJGoQoaVG 0soN+r89fCsX00A1p2eJbcX8XPQhrMF0YVc1MdTKkXe48oukpWsSMIwj1hiBaMsQ zokDR+VVLFLvHRRo/aPmy0hZnWJ4WHrojHyYRofmJeqDhKPUSdMSH387KQk5jDqv CpQSrzg3Ufilc1UBiAK2U8BAVCidNlzmNNkJMRK0m7Q8DJDhY458BgxEZf+C7dw0 TApvWyd1oTc6DHJnmP9FA1i3+bC7p+13Q6eMZVTZpZqaQMOQHCEdR3YNmNSDYfhj 1uIBKUU7QdyFpdg+/gB5Xcz7/e2JQSqJPUDP2L3M+8OMFq4nU1lRa521hbQCzAW/ sS1BA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=jv7/sP4a1Be3M47+I8oypNCVzJueFbnryTnDujE25 oA=; b=h9JzUy8tmWZI+n/2TD/r74pQbiE0xv2BKZBTaLg3hsGCyCFsXIDixovTC P/Xd/SkHpXPNmxihMQTzRxzz2V4jYhAzejLvHuJTeEzbDrMlyWVcGQMX2swd+JW9 itOSB21foCtrhVnunHPQ+t75aLIjWGEAoiil4DxWrVusYpiqACjptn8dfJeR0Xch Bb1C8RPGUNUTN/UtMwOPNpAHrNJxjl7nXrEJfjTv1Ql+Lo7s2TsCJZQLBKpVC+bI 74xgBneZx/OGw00yCibPyVwnav5MGJtuMa0JXIRsL4qA5yfQWa1B1TfCtleeMN9z tdVOFixKfDStCm+2NQjvpDZS5zb0Q==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:I00SXaA61yIYyz3DlldBFo4W9VkZl96HvfjgeR9MQ6Kesvgr5ELtXg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrudeggddutdduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptggguffhjgffgffkfhfvofesthhqmhdthhdtvdenucfhrhhomheptehlihhs shgrucevohhophgvrhcuoegrlhhishhsrgestghoohhpvghrfidrihhnqeenucffohhmrg hinhepihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecukfhppedutdekrdehuddruddtuddrleeknecurfgrrhgr mhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegrlhhishhsrgestghoohhpvghrfidrihhnnecuvehluhhsth gvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:I00SXYyr9KDxOFFxkB90v4P1sJ2nBLHJA45qdIVcUsJDeaDgD6BZJA> <xmx:I00SXYm_B6kr_F3atRM6B8kghXEkZNmeeNs04q-W9u_AlDSv_ZWB6Q> <xmx:I00SXdGsrF1YtpLK2mRtsGlpUXAaePEpioTYg3i8hstp1mocjyjxIw> <xmx:JE0SXdTs5Oia7UjmEcHX1upQ8VbgtoW3lahyR5ONhHBwpqxkHXL9kw>
Received: from alcoop-m-c46z.fios-router.home (pool-108-51-101-98.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.51.101.98]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 77DE4380084; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:34:43 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <55e454fa-0076-557f-b5b0-0f9dc0e91fdb@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:34:42 -0400
Cc: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, spasm@ietf.org, IETF Gen-ART <gen-art@ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake.all@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F230A7DC-46F3-49B7-8062-801946B7B9DE@cooperw.in>
References: <155393972295.3950.3582710869606616692@ietfa.amsl.com> <B3508ACC-5F76-4205-B380-FC4D35A4496E@vigilsec.com> <e69cf276-8b93-3210-8eb3-a93fe68b6c9d@joelhalpern.com> <7916915C-76F6-4884-A0D4-FFAA2ABEEA21@cooperw.in> <55e454fa-0076-557f-b5b0-0f9dc0e91fdb@joelhalpern.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/f_On1vXhxpsizAgOQD2iLBTHejY>
Subject: Re: [lamps] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-08
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 16:34:47 -0000

Apologies, I thought the concern remained about the TBD identifiers in the document.
Alissa

> On Jun 25, 2019, at 12:28 PM, Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:
> 
> The latest version (which I reviewed yesterday) has the assignments.
> Joel
> 
> On 6/25/19 12:27 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>> Joel, thanks for your reviews. I entered a No Objection ballot. I trust that the identifier assignments will work out with NIST.
>> Alissa
>>> On Mar 31, 2019, at 1:28 AM, Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Maybe a note that the assignment will take place once the drafts are approved, and that the RFC should coordiante with the authors and NIST on this?  (I presume we have done this before, and we do not have the problem we have in some other cases of "no number until RFC" / "no RFC until number".)
>>> 
>>> Yours,
>>> Joel
>>> 
>>> On 3/31/19 1:21 AM, Russ Housley wrote:
>>>>> On Mar 30, 2019, at 5:55 AM, Joel Halpern via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
>>>>> Review result: Almost Ready
>>>>> 
>>>>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>>>>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
>>>>> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
>>>>> like any other last call comments.
>>>>> 
>>>>> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>>>>> 
>>>>> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Document: draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-08
>>>>> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
>>>>> Review Date: 2019-03-30
>>>>> IETF LC End Date: 2019-04-10
>>>>> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
>>>>> 
>>>>> Summary: This document is almost ready for publication as a Proposed Standard
>>>>> 
>>>>> Major issues:
>>>>>    One of the key points of this RFC seems to be to assign the identifiers for
>>>>>    the use of the two SHAKE variants.  It is thus confusing that the
>>>>>    identifiers end with "TBD", and thus are not defined in this document.
>>>> They will be assigned by NIST once they are sure that these are the identifiers that we want.  This is much the same as we do when IANA is ti assign the identifier.
>>>> Russ
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gen-art mailing list
>>> Gen-art@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email