Re: [lamps] Adoption call for draft-hoffman-andrews-caa-simplification

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Thu, 08 March 2018 01:10 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BC0B126CB6 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Mar 2018 17:10:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H8nswZhwfZdE for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Mar 2018 17:10:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x235.google.com (mail-qt0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87B0D12008A for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Mar 2018 17:10:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x235.google.com with SMTP id v90so4948617qte.12 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Mar 2018 17:10:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=8EGk6Ssi+cTYezoH5xoJnSKHnGQxxfg7FJLvEd2fyLQ=; b=LAgiV47oPXGqWFQYOJCVlzsHIsCOKOsFxzCY095xhZ9dJeR+Nvcy9XZAaTiy8nxzHK bZZusJ85WKdnYyFl62eMQuRfImR4RnSifSlhCUletgEjrSb0m7WlquOnvJ3re68EL8Og hx/kjGKX0kMoPTWe/M6ovKZQNxHA4FGYXywGE=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=8EGk6Ssi+cTYezoH5xoJnSKHnGQxxfg7FJLvEd2fyLQ=; b=jb12Ch8WC1P6yuixUKwE+LkmEMgDZxQyvz/41Fi8KHBJSORSA4X5ot7w9h6/kqIWm3 CKWH5eayDWrZiaD+x2FdCVsHK21lnF9EfrjTlo+AlDTsp4z/dzdiYb4rk4KJNs0jA2HA PIIvORMI+Rk94fzepf1gnqSY15yb3PwYBgo0JB9pKrbIZTTtPNdeP/cSPm++JInu1SP+ E0VkQWaJPcLkn1K78BubWkjcrbT2Ol9B4+p+0PtYi5fjjMUyuvxUFHy1PgLsG9H7xDMQ VTRVnK4/P0e+OJsGIlpRsylA8YkwOTs7UNBu6y7V9GHu8S2JQy3Qpba18DuDkn/81IXE fY7Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7FTrg5r+0ntZRYQ0DkAzWG8RNGt9C/bLDAOgN5ahxcPAv69QkVm SiqJ4roL1SbKDpCqj6cvm1ZfTw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELvl8+DM6RKxR0/Na/z6ncmheVFQxsNy7BeR0Q/0zTgGpX68f3pTR75RQK2kWWJNRgANnKo9dA==
X-Received: by 10.200.50.75 with SMTP id y11mr36671912qta.153.1520471426576; Wed, 07 Mar 2018 17:10:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.16.0.18] ([96.231.225.106]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z9sm13104183qtb.49.2018.03.07.17.10.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 07 Mar 2018 17:10:25 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
In-Reply-To: <588FD7CB-1D4D-4EBA-8CC0-B671BF871359@vigilsec.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 20:10:24 -0500
Cc: SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <85B71AC7-C4E8-4D02-8909-001D454E446F@sn3rd.com>
References: <588FD7CB-1D4D-4EBA-8CC0-B671BF871359@vigilsec.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/faBTJH5tDRfYW6DLNyU4gY68rps>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Adoption call for draft-hoffman-andrews-caa-simplification
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 01:10:29 -0000

I believe we should adopt this draft to begin work on obsoleting RFC6844.  I agree with Paul about a section/appendix that says here’s what was changed.

spt.

> On Feb 24, 2018, at 14:28, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
> Should draft-hoffman-andrews-caa-simplification be adopted by the LAMPS WG as the starting point for rfc6844bis?
> 
> Please voice you opinion by March 10th.
> 
> Russ
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm