Re: [lamps] EST CSR attrs discussion

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sun, 01 August 2021 21:27 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4157A3A11DB for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 14:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sWhlXWIqzqVb for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 14:26:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74C863A1221 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 14:26:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C893389E4; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 17:31:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id WuqBGKboX0dK; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 17:30:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BD7938998; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 17:30:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC8F6B24; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 17:26:52 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>, spasm@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <8b8b0355-c247-1e0a-a80d-5d86eb554873@lear.ch>
References: <e87a9fef-9e8c-d470-a6dc-77684cac0005@lounge.org> <8b8b0355-c247-1e0a-a80d-5d86eb554873@lear.ch>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2021 17:26:52 -0400
Message-ID: <10887.1627853212@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/hzvQfzU2mBYX1cSEJfQB0rt05ps>
Subject: Re: [lamps] EST CSR attrs discussion
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2021 21:27:10 -0000

Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> wrote:
    > opaque, and really could stand for further elaboration, since it does seem
    > one CAN specify values.  The best way to do that is probably a draft, aiming
    > toward informational, but I'm out of bandwidth at the moment.

Well, I could write a draft, but it will return CBOR described by CDDL.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide