IETF Logo Mail Archive

[lamps] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: FN-DSA Documents

Kris Kwiatkowski <kris@amongbytes.com> Tue, 07 April 2026 11:30 UTC

Return-Path: <kris@amongbytes.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: spasm@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5157AD76C18F for <spasm@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Apr 2026 04:30:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1775561444; bh=TcoT907bBbqWlMQu602ZswiNJGNr+Ei2I+NaF0xg+k4=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=GmPUBbv5haIgO6N9vFy2n+bTrn69b892KILJIPy0EGnkm0thwIpIs5PUge2VF8PzE pe2T2GUeM+Mipg7paLAv+EKwcGOPT5THQW87jBb+TPuavc41MmxwfDiM11k9LCwubg 1tE/7k+rHnkV8SXdZQSlAdsQeQVspvjq5yk1fprM=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=amongbytes.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ESB2Zhf88k-Z for <spasm@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Apr 2026 04:30:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 7.mo580.mail-out.ovh.net (7.mo580.mail-out.ovh.net [46.105.48.3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19844D76C188 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Apr 2026 04:30:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxplan8.mail.ovh.net (unknown [10.109.249.56]) by mo580.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4fqkXC51x5z5xXh for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Apr 2026 11:30:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from amongbytes.com (37.59.142.99) by mxplan8.mail.ovh.net (172.16.2.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.61; Tue, 7 Apr 2026 13:30:35 +0200
Authentication-Results: garm.ovh; auth=pass (GARM-99G0031fd4d53c-b3e6-4c16-8010-d5f2624223d4, 419BFE8365C6D9E9695D851E42C699B41CF0FBA4) smtp.auth=kris@amongbytes.com
X-OVh-ClientIp: 88.97.253.244
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------0R0zj0BX2dz72BYLYSGdhFQ0"
Message-ID: <6802e50b-d821-4862-9804-024f2ffee328@amongbytes.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2026 12:29:48 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-GB
To: spasm@ietf.org
References: <7EDE5062-308F-4626-AC53-91CACBF9BA74@vigilsec.com> <CAMjbhoUB5nXO7BamX_LDUN9ZJAP3tYxZ=YNd8anhEyXMFXJO5g@mail.gmail.com> <MW4PR09MB100598A22D3CFDB2DBE760857F351A@MW4PR09MB10059.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
From: Kris Kwiatkowski <kris@amongbytes.com>
In-Reply-To: <MW4PR09MB100598A22D3CFDB2DBE760857F351A@MW4PR09MB10059.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
X-Ovh-Tracer-GUID: 69d60dcc-548c-489e-ad99-995450f538a2
X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 16923120028737519383
X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK
X-VR-SPAMSCORE: 0
X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: 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
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=yJ6Q5oSgfZ/St4YDwPCvGtmeU5+ior/Z7CkCOz0nqRE=; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amongbytes.com; h=From; s=ovhmo2671616-selector1; t=1775561435; v=1; b=YKxJZPW6/UFkiKaPM5zSpe+nZHgleiy5tXPohAqctIJdo/86S5fWPXkOpg5tL2M+irXmDLnz EYSKtsdDoZjrnOHN5gP+z+oNgGyRtLLbcxQR/zJ3xY0wNwdREa08catRCix/X1yM9VkxmMYHlWZ aWfbLzbQACuPuNP+bY2srdtcbESRscz/Hq9PK0YkcEh3P4ZhAT+CdaKy2bp0IB8+G3hwbAnqINx y7HJ0fOdM6eh3ctj6xTwQXGoSCxD4U8csmvnxfzWR7kTgvjSKVOkQEnzSkoWu25XI0bdZaHY38G 7VMo2I16hxe5Cm4d9QvT4BphAlDGwn8hBvGyyn6VaznWg==
Message-ID-Hash: GE2BVTWQNEQ5HHTEFDIL6GCX3QK7XMM5
X-Message-ID-Hash: GE2BVTWQNEQ5HHTEFDIL6GCX3QK7XMM5
X-MailFrom: kris@amongbytes.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-spasm.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [lamps] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: FN-DSA Documents
List-Id: This is the mail list for the LAMPS Working Group <spasm.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/iFELouPxaQnew-_WcmtRZ77W_w4>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:spasm-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:spasm-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:spasm-leave@ietf.org>

I support adoption.

Adoption of these documents is independent of the outcome of FIPS 206. They 
will probably follow FIPS 206 normatively, possibly with limited local 
adaptations.

Kris

On 02/04/2026 12:59, Dang, Quynh H. (Fed) wrote:
>
> I expect an IPD will get published soon and a revision of it will get 
> finalized maybe by the end of this year or early next year and there is a 
> good chance that the revision would be the final specification.
>
> We need everyone to review it carefully then provide us your comments.
>
> Regards,
>
> Quynh.
>
> *From:*Bas Westerbaan <bas=40cloudflare.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 1, 2026 5:39 PM
> *To:* Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
> *Cc:* IETF LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [lamps] Re: FN-DSA Documents
>
> Happy for them to be adopted.
>
> Let me add to Scott's comments that NIST hasn't started the IPD phase yet. I 
> expect it will take some time to work out the kinks before we see a final 
> standard (not having seen the draft yet,) and it'll be good for folks here 
> to join that process early, as also operational decisions not disimilar to 
> those of prehashing and private key format will have to be made.
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2026 at 8:45 PM Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
>
>     We have two FN-DSA documents: draft-turner-lamps-cms-fn-dsa and
>     draft-turner-lamps-fn-dsa-certificates.
>
>     I would like to see the LAMPS WG adopt these, and then push them forward
>     when NISP publishes FIPS 206 and assigns the OIDs.  What do others think?
>
>     Russ
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Spasm mailing list -- spasm@ietf.org
>     To unsubscribe send an email to spasm-leave@ietf.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list --spasm@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email tospasm-leave@ietf.org

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status