Re: [lamps] rfc7030-est clarifications of ASN.1

[Russ Housley <[e-mail]>]

Tanks Jim.  Yes, RFC 6268 obsoletes the module that I referenced.

Russ


> On Aug 7, 2019, at 11:22 PM, Jim Schaad <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Michael,
> 
> If you tried to learn it back that far, I don't think that it was even part
> of the language at that point in time.  
> 
> Just a quick note on the module that Russ provided.  The import for the CMS
> module is incorrect.  It should be:
> 
>     FROM CryptographicMessageSyntax-2010  -- [RFC6268]
>       { iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) rsadsi(113549)
>         pkcs(1) pkcs-9(9) smime(16) modules(0)
>          id-mod-cms-2009(58) }
> 
> jim
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Spasm <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Michael Richardson
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2019 6:25 PM
> To: Russ Housley <[e-mail]>
> Cc: LAMPS WG <[e-mail]>
> Subject: Re: [lamps] rfc7030-est clarifications of ASN.1
> 
> 
> Russ Housley <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> I think this is not real ASN.1 syntax, but rather an indication for
> me
>>> to insert more stuff?  Or is this something real that I don't
>>> understand.
> 
>> No, this is real ASN.1 syntax.
> 
> okay.
> It's something I once tried to learn, back in 1995, and I got as far as the
> trivial stuff, but that was all.
> 
> I will incorporate your module into the clarifications document.
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>, Sandelman Software Works  -=
> IPv6 IoT consulting =-
> 
> 
> 
>