IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] struggling with CSRAttrs

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 30 September 2022 16:39 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD778C1524A5 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 09:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.706
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.706 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (bad RSA signature)" header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b8X_DKarzIdz for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 09:38:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00:e000:2bb::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9C8BC1524A1 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 09:38:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (ipv6.dooku.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:6::1]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FC6F1F455; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 16:38:54 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1664555934; bh=M+KgwZZoktHw3AKMRoQdjHd7E9UiJPKKWPyM9aIFdwE=; h=From:To:Subject:In-reply-to:References:Date:From; b=gBRyFtK5uycS3p4HGvwQDpAUs91diWHDl4oKML1NJvuydQx5mIxU/nP/uac9Aw+0h y4Bi8z/JxzPJlnCh+fprbbYJ3tSyvVC1H3Y+U8SS4We/grnVq3Slu3sVyUU27Y+6vq dy6/8R2Me3098B1Wld1JK0f4h9ecf5KF5P65ndJbUWy6GA/rLIGY5JAlVWPtF0+jq/ 0lYWXdBKrw3/ScrnY1S69CSfb+K+RSZdCKGgEq9Y1rLlUgShbo/cqq7S9mJooU7JDw bWt2khdhCXROxTL73/w5D6bBOrawOIwqkv3YikIOfiSBqGcMe2zIy7WxamywdDgypx texb8q3Ev0LSg==
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id E2C8E1A0753; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 18:38:50 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Corey Bonnell <Corey.Bonnell=40digicert.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <DM6PR14MB218658CA89AB81F66D1FF551929D9@DM6PR14MB2186.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
References: <12352.1657505901@localhost> <ada963a796ca3fafb42a29751020ff4326fd2a1e.camel@von-Oheimb.de> <563732.1659120308@dooku> <36c409c2-ab92-4ec2-6f1e-235652a243d9@siemens.com> <56a8af3a-63f2-5f19-62d9-59469ab678bf@siemens.com> <DM6PR14MB218658CA89AB81F66D1FF551929D9@DM6PR14MB2186.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Corey Bonnell <Corey.Bonnell=40digicert.com@dmarc.ietf.org> message dated "Tue, 02 Aug 2022 13:10:02 -0000."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 27.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 18:38:50 +0200
Message-ID: <811284.1664555930@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/iU9GVde9eHVIDlK0yQobYHASoRw>
Subject: Re: [lamps] struggling with CSRAttrs
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 16:39:01 -0000

Corey Bonnell <Corey.Bonnell=40digicert.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
    > I don’t think the critical BOOLEAN should be tagged above. RFC 5280,
    > section 4.1 [1] defines Extension as:

I've figured this out, and I've fixed my code.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email