IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-08

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Tue, 25 June 2019 16:28 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C226A120825; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gLlQQlj-9z1d; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:28:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailb2.tigertech.net (mailb2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.154]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F42F120821; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:28:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45YBRp6ZYYzYmPN; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:28:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1561480118; bh=kKzyPXYbGQkrBP8UAbQUVyJs6v0YzBM7KfKd6Vnuwvw=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=PtA0ZzXluPIa1J0aHrL9wWK36oF5t7vU6vrSQaGSAtcCiewXCisnueG7sKk61z5JN pI1Qp528wtbKh087wEglXYBlbiSBX1fYPJDwJpGIKdGCdUEhpgYeXsMO39YG46AY2p 1ynplSEoDGSHu8ly5MKV9NadDC1XtaPqk1Q/rxew=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at b2.tigertech.net
Received: from Joels-MacBook-Pro.local (209-255-163-147.ip.mcleodusa.net [209.255.163.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45YBRn5jvWzYlLK; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:28:37 -0700 (PDT)
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Cc: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, spasm@ietf.org, IETF Gen-ART <gen-art@ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake.all@ietf.org
References: <155393972295.3950.3582710869606616692@ietfa.amsl.com> <B3508ACC-5F76-4205-B380-FC4D35A4496E@vigilsec.com> <e69cf276-8b93-3210-8eb3-a93fe68b6c9d@joelhalpern.com> <7916915C-76F6-4884-A0D4-FFAA2ABEEA21@cooperw.in>
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Message-ID: <55e454fa-0076-557f-b5b0-0f9dc0e91fdb@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:28:36 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7916915C-76F6-4884-A0D4-FFAA2ABEEA21@cooperw.in>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/imRtcRWyglsnlRlVuGLpql2Fi7k>
Subject: Re: [lamps] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-08
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 16:28:41 -0000

The latest version (which I reviewed yesterday) has the assignments.
Joel

On 6/25/19 12:27 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
> Joel, thanks for your reviews. I entered a No Objection ballot. I trust that the identifier assignments will work out with NIST.
> 
> Alissa
> 
>> On Mar 31, 2019, at 1:28 AM, Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:
>>
>> Maybe a note that the assignment will take place once the drafts are approved, and that the RFC should coordiante with the authors and NIST on this?  (I presume we have done this before, and we do not have the problem we have in some other cases of "no number until RFC" / "no RFC until number".)
>>
>> Yours,
>> Joel
>>
>> On 3/31/19 1:21 AM, Russ Housley wrote:
>>>> On Mar 30, 2019, at 5:55 AM, Joel Halpern via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
>>>> Review result: Almost Ready
>>>>
>>>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>>>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
>>>> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
>>>> like any other last call comments.
>>>>
>>>> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>>>>
>>>> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>>>>
>>>> Document: draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-08
>>>> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
>>>> Review Date: 2019-03-30
>>>> IETF LC End Date: 2019-04-10
>>>> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
>>>>
>>>> Summary: This document is almost ready for publication as a Proposed Standard
>>>>
>>>> Major issues:
>>>>     One of the key points of this RFC seems to be to assign the identifiers for
>>>>     the use of the two SHAKE variants.  It is thus confusing that the
>>>>     identifiers end with "TBD", and thus are not defined in this document.
>>> They will be assigned by NIST once they are sure that these are the identifiers that we want.  This is much the same as we do when IANA is ti assign the identifier.
>>> Russ
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gen-art mailing list
>> Gen-art@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email