[lamps] Alissa Cooper's Yes on draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5751-bis-10: (with COMMENT)

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Thu, 05 July 2018 13:31 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5751-bis@ietf.org, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, lamps-chairs@ietf.org, housley@vigilsec.com, spasm@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <153079746086.11265.4187169970043321882.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2018 06:31:00 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/inLfhLsud6Jw1oflCTSQ_ZlHJlw>
Subject: [lamps] Alissa Cooper's Yes on draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5751-bis-10: (with COMMENT)

Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5751-bis-10: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5751-bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In Appendix B:

This is a sentence fragment: "the fact they are no longer
      considered to be collision resistant the security levels of the
      signatures are generally considered suspect.

also s/that it it/that is it/

[lamps] Alissa Cooper's Yes on draft-ietf-lamps-r… Alissa Cooper