IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Spasm] New Version Notification for draft-wconner-blake2sigs-00.txt

Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org> Mon, 01 May 2017 19:35 UTC

Return-Path: <brian@briansmith.org>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A90E12EB19 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 May 2017 12:35:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=briansmith-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id khDUItksJ5Qf for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 May 2017 12:34:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x22c.google.com (mail-io0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 746D912878D for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 May 2017 12:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id p80so129848535iop.3 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 May 2017 12:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=briansmith-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JMuoruHu4EgqDoyfC7DJVdR1PspXn2pvoZYWGm0Tfp4=; b=F+TcYD/bmNqt2T5kSJhKzWzRQ0LX7G772oyt69KOlUv4fwaC0hKChhHsmsu83JepLJ DnN7pvAi/BCZslgfeGGjQjLRoBEE6/uTRNtqsHlJw8owV6Mvzz8t+cDLvc8JT74ZKtwt hhZbjnwZmUieVYn9lvp7Bx5/R0rPNNQcDv5ukAl8PLwyYwl7dLnd9tCpOYSs0D1I/A4W wFm41QSxhQa+fGJ/QPkucdkom3xAzrsb0cMCreO+YF1XN4ocNeOg/DlpPTieWIeYNtJY gPU5eWxDUqqsHGU7WtUuOGfwKPcVq5zcsF1PcEEOmSHvK1xXNSuyo/vUZYgHblPoyhnR w9+g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JMuoruHu4EgqDoyfC7DJVdR1PspXn2pvoZYWGm0Tfp4=; b=HOwizTVs+elWO1FGHOHQWYlrYpC48ofMjwneIrIUGtSo/N4k7fxvioIS5NrXrz4pXb KlNLfAmJedQHLFoaomSM8vZvAf35JWN0CLbHkxhm+jXEKmX0vzZsVzhVrGlPSVf5ssQk au4127UDMMgoOt2pqJnDwdY6G6E/XT+J32m0lIIM8XeF0u/2sgddjoSAZJsypRtC+VCs Al9D2sZnNeHMP6WAHgvAzgKetHvj92Xuou9zC63qI5c6+IqutPzmlXy4wJpFpOiZf/Tm PVPyv4E3W0UMAD0nX+ieXd06KWoRG2QAzzSbwiCdd+X4RBbeoXS8F9gMXf4jHVMIZnXP dRsQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/6VvSx+3grEKUuiKdz0tXzbrkiY4JyKxSo386X8TdcfsWX6ob1p GBFpHeG47AhwcTLb8VrYcMXe7i6l5A==
X-Received: by 10.107.50.136 with SMTP id y130mr29634623ioy.152.1493667112773; Mon, 01 May 2017 12:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.36.77.84 with HTTP; Mon, 1 May 2017 12:31:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8854FBBB-F70C-4D1C-A272-1CFF983E7EB9@vigilsec.com>
References: <149218146333.15800.10260233763572420696.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAFTQxQtMSzVNr8oae1U6Nbu_YjkYbTDxk6FJ2FkA4yH9vGnZ0g@mail.gmail.com> <8854FBBB-F70C-4D1C-A272-1CFF983E7EB9@vigilsec.com>
From: Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>
Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 09:31:51 -1000
Message-ID: <CAFewVt5T1OEeTRqwSyrkJpZyUzO9Eo5XaR6OdF4u-+WA6NACqg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: William Conner <wconner@google.com>, SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/jB1qTXvOXoFHxjyb_L6PIzLd5MQ>
Subject: Re: [Spasm] New Version Notification for draft-wconner-blake2sigs-00.txt
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 19:35:00 -0000

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> As a matter of taste, I’d prefer to see the Object Identifiers assigned in
> the PKIX algorithm arc:
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/smi-numbers.xhtml#smi-numbers-1.3.6.1.5.5.7.6
>
> The Object Identifiers will be slightly smaller, but not enough to argue
> about.  My preference is to have them assigned in an arc that is managed by
> IANA.

I disagree with this. OIDs should be as small as possible to maximize
the number of (constrained) situations the standard can be used.

Cheers,
Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email