IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Draft LAMPS Recharter

Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> Wed, 09 May 2018 19:49 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB33C127863 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 May 2018 12:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kzc34VuS5Wix for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 May 2018 12:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.augustcellars.com (augustcellars.com [50.45.239.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48A21127909 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 May 2018 12:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Jude (73.180.8.170) by mail2.augustcellars.com (192.168.0.56) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1347.2; Wed, 9 May 2018 12:47:11 -0700
From: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
To: 'Russ Housley' <housley@vigilsec.com>, 'LAMPS' <spasm@ietf.org>
References: <1D329233-AFCE-421B-81FE-EDDC30386260@vigilsec.com> <94C70910-6BA3-4364-BE43-3316AE1E51C6@vigilsec.com> <CAErg=HF40T1CLuu=5GebtsvFMphtSRyK+O5TpTn0pTz1v9jMgQ@mail.gmail.com> <64CD1067-8639-4C2C-A8EC-ED5FBC14F633@gmail.com> <CAErg=HHXj4tVoQ06Z_ZNJKnCF9efd64DOx5Hf_sLaqATX6+OWQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwhkugUvtd_rmbXYDXCzBhKD=fc7gbxpWeSzzasmGFDFZw@mail.gmail.com> <CAErg=HF89sRyUrYcqcG=_onnW_NnsyNN2CKWQ8ty=Xb_v8nOkw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwjSTBfV32NT66_vA=EX4OPnx5qxYjbHG92NVzJpCwq8nw@mail.gmail.com> <CAErg=HFaS1g-S2zu04sCXZ_58OUPJ26Tg0RzS1V4UkTWejfO9Q@mail.gmail.com> <B3943C41-9B6D-4979-8B8B-C7477C8863C6@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <B3943C41-9B6D-4979-8B8B-C7477C8863C6@vigilsec.com>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 12:49:42 -0700
Message-ID: <003901d3e7ce$e0faac00$a2f00400$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQEb84RaDFSXoIcBGFWBOtDhOCt5FQJPW+/VAa1emooCGgdVaQLfUoctAks58bICurG6HQIN46Q3AYVI+0UCeIrojaT3eNCg
Content-Language: en-us
X-Originating-IP: [73.180.8.170]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/jEmXg8lPWeejg9GJObXbao9UhMA>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Draft LAMPS Recharter
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 19:49:54 -0000

I am unsure that this is a good use of the WG time.  I think that this can
be done just as easily through the Independent Submissions stream.

Jim


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Spasm <spasm-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Russ Housley
> Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 12:09 PM
> To: LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [lamps] Draft LAMPS Recharter
> 
> Based on the I-D that Wei recently posted, do people think we should add a
> work item:
> 
> 7. Specify new extended key usage identifiers when there is a significant
> constituency that will make use of certificates that include that new
> identifier.
> 
> Russ
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status