IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] X.510

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 23 September 2019 18:10 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25CE11208DC for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:10:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O68G-gpJt7s9 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:10:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5AAA1208E8 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:10:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582A6300B12 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:10:00 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id L4MMXnzT48xs for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:09:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (unknown [138.88.156.37]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1CF8E300470; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:09:58 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <CC7C0AD5-97D8-4A17-8274-C8EEA064018A@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DEBE2ED7-EB8B-415D-B52E-0BFE50C2DF5A"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:09:59 -0400
In-Reply-To: <000601d57081$5afa8fc0$10efaf40$@x500.eu>
Cc: LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>
To: Erik Andersen <era@x500.eu>
References: <000601d57081$5afa8fc0$10efaf40$@x500.eu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/jc8WgbdaDrrNpHDSmdHUX7CPu0c>
Subject: Re: [lamps] X.510
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 18:10:13 -0000

Erik:

I think it would be better to reference RFC 5083 instead of RFC 8084.

Russ


> On Sep 21, 2019, at 9:34 AM, Erik Andersen <era@x500.eu> wrote:
> 
> Within ITU-T and ISO we have developed a new specification, Rec. ITU-T X.510 | ISO/IEC 9594-11, which now is out for final vote. There is a link to it here <https://www.dropbox.com/s/qzzuy9hu2vjz9qw/X.510-dis.pdf?dl=0>. We expect to complete it by March 2020.
>  
> Any comment any of you might have will be highly appreciated.
>  
> Best regards,
>  
> Erik
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org <mailto:Spasm@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email