IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-10

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Fri, 30 June 2017 19:18 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C353127867 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Jun 2017 12:18:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8odCdWWLQwHe for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Jun 2017 12:18:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mournblade.imrryr.org (mournblade.imrryr.org [108.5.242.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3708126B7E for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Jun 2017 12:18:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mournblade.imrryr.org (Postfix, from userid 1034) id D24E57A3309; Fri, 30 Jun 2017 19:18:51 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 19:18:51 +0000
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
To: SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20170630191851.GD5673@mournblade.imrryr.org>
Reply-To: spasm@ietf.org
References: <1AE5876A-D3B4-4711-A701-03F64532F3B0@vigilsec.com> <678040CE-455A-41FB-B877-054652348D52@vigilsec.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <678040CE-455A-41FB-B877-054652348D52@vigilsec.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/kL88eMxJJDS96BcnFZCggXn_OSM>
Subject: Re: [lamps] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-10
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 19:18:54 -0000

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 12:28:48PM -0400, Russ Housley wrote:

> With the posting of draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-12, I believe that all
> WG Last Call comments have bee resolved.  I will notify our Area Director
> that the document is ready.

Indeed, grammar issues aside, which I expect will be addressed by
the RFC editor, looks largely done to me.  It'll soon be time to
resume work to support the new name type in OpenSSL.  This time
with rfc822Name name constraints applied to both rfc822Name and
SMTPUtf8Name subjectAltNames.

My only technical quibble is that I'd have preferred to also see
deprecation of support for email addresses in the subject DN,
subject altnames have been broadly supported for a long time.  This
is a non-critical issue.  If there's not broad support for doing
that at this time, I have no substantial issues with the -12 draft.

-- 
	Viktor.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email