IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8649 (6976)

Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com> Mon, 23 May 2022 22:18 UTC

Return-Path: <csmiley@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE3BBC183F84 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 May 2022 15:18:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dVO6qVbe6cfH for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 May 2022 15:18:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D068C183F82 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 May 2022 15:18:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D5B8427C643; Mon, 23 May 2022 15:18:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HFnL4pYfwdbw; Mon, 23 May 2022 15:18:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.14] (cpe-76-95-228-63.socal.res.rr.com [76.95.228.63]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CF216425A344; Mon, 23 May 2022 15:18:23 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220519232907.E2096163315@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 15:18:22 -0700
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <38B81D1F-574B-46DC-9459-A3C81A62D60C@amsl.com>
References: <20220519232907.E2096163315@rfcpa.amsl.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, "Roman D. Danyliw" <rdd@cert.org>, Paul Wouters <paul.wouters@aiven.io>, Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek@digicert.com>, alexnora479@gmail.com, spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/kM8p0EYL5ZvxyQxxfQyFtt7WzJs>
Subject: Re: [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8649 (6976)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 22:18:28 -0000

Greetings,

FYI - this report has been deleted as junk.

Thank you.

RFC Editor/cs


> On May 19, 2022, at 4:29 PM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8649,
> "Hash Of Root Key Certificate Extension".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6976
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Clara smith <alexnora479@gmail.com>
> 
> Section: 8119
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> Yes 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> No 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> Something good
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8649 (draft-ietf-lamps-hash-of-root-key-cert-extn-07)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Hash Of Root Key Certificate Extension
> Publication Date    : August 2019
> Author(s)           : R. Housley
> Category            : INFORMATIONAL
> Source              : Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email