Re: [lamps] Hybrid pkix isn't needed
Hubert Kario <hkario@redhat.com> Mon, 30 January 2023 13:40 UTC
Return-Path: <hkario@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E9C2C14F724 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 05:40:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m_p3Anb0DyYK for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 05:40:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8FDEC14F721 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 05:40:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1675086028; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qvgbPqqp7exdM5dsiqpS9q7RTppK4zdDkWgl52YK+nE=; b=HQZrUReEygnmcPTUehOUXNT1mqBd/LUmNPWQ6I1EiDZaTPNB5YiyvlFfNpsk+ZS3XOu3UE Q/qaBlXisREFZ1PEI6Dh1aJFkgKbP/K6dfpu9HeA3nuF54LAcbdgdVw66xn9zo1aQpIBLT i5WKQEgeGMrVpxbWZc0jRWaGL4wZwns=
Received: from mail-ej1-f71.google.com (mail-ej1-f71.google.com [209.85.218.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-507-4BTyBO-pPs-LdRbVL43LnA-1; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 08:40:27 -0500
X-MC-Unique: 4BTyBO-pPs-LdRbVL43LnA-1
Received: by mail-ej1-f71.google.com with SMTP id xh12-20020a170906da8c00b007413144e87fso7426457ejb.14 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 05:40:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:user-agent:organization:references :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:date:subject:cc:to:from :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=mHzu0VXPBhF0hbUC5V0i5khYHVFwzqe8/P4EhStoRS4=; b=7I3IHWhFhdzyfFifT0dtAhwOBlYbXRkvbdiXBGjW+0LCDx+aFr+pgR3Ld0Zoy3Se9a U9X+vLthDjgfGWf6A6Txj1nQrYdzrBJ1LeDiw6T44I78PAQpGS1GTPlh2zrfd+uYDuIO t3G1MwKFc/92sjA0uwqrf/5Md57gDlMMrIGA0jTMv1XPxfF5FGUijtK5HNje2QDlHB0y TF99uLudhe8EK6ZgKmprdbuUWl+JPuL79nSgRCWs3+Bm50t08DEqLiuvr3AY4+DYvtBW 75bkiXGCYZp6VZjdpbDA+vjOJ9sVfWHXDA9HopjEHFziQLJwRckZ54ICSPs7niWZDDdP FALw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKVcySUuRBFCVuvJcS310QTOa7bKFVDVOyfB6rs/JwSc0PYubA1j LfnOyZxUdKmsIBdL4a89qU/difwl0NV9a0dp/jKapqo0a5iA+fCDbdMAZ7o6R6ks18XXvDkCdDA oVL/bmg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:528a:b0:49f:88ef:8d76 with SMTP id en10-20020a056402528a00b0049f88ef8d76mr28736964edb.29.1675086025969; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 05:40:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set97R/dd2ID91hvf7sQqYjoLv4aANJfhDXj0LIUJta7IfjPnUzimXWFzAetf9nw1o0R2d2n8Gw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:528a:b0:49f:88ef:8d76 with SMTP id en10-20020a056402528a00b0049f88ef8d76mr28736944edb.29.1675086025731; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 05:40:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (ip-94-112-137-58.bb.vodafone.cz. [94.112.137.58]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h16-20020a50ed90000000b0049ef04ad502sm6821542edr.40.2023.01.30.05.40.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 30 Jan 2023 05:40:25 -0800 (PST)
From: Hubert Kario <hkario@redhat.com>
To: Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>
Cc: spasm@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 14:40:23 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <fb563158-fbe3-44a0-adb3-93cba10ac4a4@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <Y9eVt/hf8vlUPpkB@LK-Perkele-VII2.locald>
References: <CACsn0c=uPvp_hmakpfPff8WkYh1q9NhjfTJYs7iFu_czL2yAyA@mail.gmail.com> <CAFTXyYBCZRgBpJ_j1AQSek7Dm7tjW3hAg8h06+hL4iXZ8iDbog@mail.gmail.com> <Y9eVt/hf8vlUPpkB@LK-Perkele-VII2.locald>
Organization: Red Hat
User-Agent: Trojita/0.7-git; Qt/5.15.7; xcb; Linux; Fedora release 36 (Thirty Six)
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/m4GOscG8K1XgN5yz5PkrroOr1C8>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Hybrid pkix isn't needed
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 13:40:30 -0000
On Monday, 30 January 2023 11:02:31 CET, Ilari Liusvaara wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 02:46:50PM +0900, Tadahiko Ito wrote: >> 2023年1月30日(月) 8:43 Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>: > Well, for code-signing or time-stamping, I don't think either of those > works very well: > > - Bonded certs are extremely complicated. > - Hybrid certs need to be backward-compatible for depoloyment reasons, > which requires very nasty hacks. Huh? Why we need them backwards compatible? We didn't need anything like that for ECDSA certs before... -- Regards, Hubert Kario Principal Quality Engineer, RHEL Crypto team Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic
- [lamps] Hybrid pkix isn't needed Watson Ladd
- Re: [lamps] Hybrid pkix isn't needed Michael Markowitz
- Re: [lamps] Hybrid pkix isn't needed Watson Ladd
- Re: [lamps] Hybrid pkix isn't needed Tadahiko Ito
- Re: [lamps] Hybrid pkix isn't needed Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [lamps] Hybrid pkix isn't needed Hubert Kario
- Re: [lamps] Hybrid pkix isn't needed Mike Ounsworth
- Re: [lamps] Hybrid pkix isn't needed Watson Ladd
- Re: [lamps] Hybrid pkix isn't needed Seo Suchan
- Re: [lamps] Hybrid pkix isn't needed Watson Ladd
- Re: [lamps] [EXTERNAL] Re: Hybrid pkix isn't need… Mike Ounsworth
- Re: [lamps] Hybrid pkix isn't needed Stephen Farrell
- Re: [lamps] Hybrid pkix isn't needed Tadahiko Ito
- Re: [lamps] Hybrid pkix isn't needed Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [lamps] Hybrid pkix isn't needed Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [lamps] Hybrid pkix isn't needed Carl Wallace
- Re: [lamps] [EXTERNAL] Re: Hybrid pkix isn't need… Mike Ounsworth
- Re: [lamps] Hybrid pkix isn't needed Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [lamps] Hybrid pkix isn't needed Tim Hollebeek