Re: [lamps] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-15: (with COMMENT)
"Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Fri, 05 January 2018 12:10 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E2E126579 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jan 2018 04:10:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=ietf@kuehlewind.net header.d=kuehlewind.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dD6JenKaugvu for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jan 2018 04:10:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kuehlewind.net (kuehlewind.net [83.169.45.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E8F5127136 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jan 2018 04:10:17 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=kuehlewind.net; b=mrsITcHKKh0+TPTFiBRaUCNBAPGSWDMw5KwkP+V8skGg3sk/EPBd4P4icGcIX1GkPOL4BMxAJNDOW1tSecMSImkPDFH300LFzZduHNfqjj9nnSAEAEX6FD1Urqyl72OoLYs0zaFLUqFXpbQBTh+JgPzg4UzdFBX/gGBpopo7MmE=; h=Received:Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To:X-Mailer:X-PPP-Message-ID:X-PPP-Vhost;
Received: (qmail 15856 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2018 13:10:15 +0100
Received: from pd9e117c1.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (HELO ?192.168.178.33?) (217.225.23.193) by kuehlewind.net with ESMTPSA (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted, authenticated); 5 Jan 2018 13:10:15 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <3B8E1807-E30F-49FD-8C37-BBA793ECFA3B@vigilsec.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2018 13:10:14 +0100
Cc: SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses@ietf.org, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AFD66276-1EE4-4476-A285-B60999C1D272@kuehlewind.net>
References: <151507723820.23678.730726448053216801.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <3B8E1807-E30F-49FD-8C37-BBA793ECFA3B@vigilsec.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
X-PPP-Message-ID: <20180105121015.15849.66455@lvps83-169-45-111.dedicated.hosteurope.de>
X-PPP-Vhost: kuehlewind.net
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/mqpsXrIZsi0YAh0UfTA-9XOQWJo>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-15: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2018 12:10:20 -0000
I see. Thanks! > Am 04.01.2018 um 20:17 schrieb Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>: > > Mirja: > > Please see draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5280-i18n-update, which is already in the RFC Editor's queue waiting for this document to catch up. > > Russ > > >> On Jan 4, 2018, at 9:47 AM, Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> wrote: >> >> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-15: No Objection >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >> introductory paragraph, however.) >> >> >> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html >> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >> >> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses/ >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> I don't know much about this subject, so I'm balloting 'No Objection', however, >> section 4 and section 6 read to me that this doc should update RFC5280. Please >> check! >> >> >
- [lamps] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-i… Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [lamps] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dra… Russ Housley
- Re: [lamps] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dra… Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)