[lamps] Call for adoption of draft-kario-pkcs12-pbmac1

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Tue, 20 September 2022 20:30 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF54C14CF15 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 13:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xsEAshlU1xXq for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 13:30:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D120BC14CF11 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 13:30:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A802913E203 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:30:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (unknown [96.241.2.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9DB2413DCCB for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:30:19 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:30:19 -0400
References: <PH0PR00MB10003EC6A096FE0A363BBFB9F5459@PH0PR00MB1000.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <PH0PR00MB10002A7A2850A1333B4F6C00F54A9@PH0PR00MB1000.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
To: LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR00MB10002A7A2850A1333B4F6C00F54A9@PH0PR00MB1000.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
Message-Id: <636EA85D-E047-433D-96C2-777ABCCCE1F4@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.09 on 66.39.134.11
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/ociMAtoxjTqAnhBvRMDclaBGLcw>
Subject: [lamps] Call for adoption of draft-kario-pkcs12-pbmac1
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 20:30:24 -0000

There has been some discussion of https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kario-pkcs12-pbmac1.  During the discussion at the virtual interim session on Monday, there was a lot of support for this document.  I have put this document at the front of the list in the hope that we can take care of this straightforward document before the large bundle of PQC-related documents that are going to consume so much of the time in the working group.

Should the LAMPS WG adopt “Use of Password Based Message Authentication Code 1 (PBMAC1) in PKCS #12 Syntax” in draft-kario-pkcs12-pbmac1-00?

Please reply to this message by Monday, 3 October 2022 to voice your support or opposition to adoption.

On behalf of the LAMPS WG Chairs,
Russ