Re: [lamps] WG Last Call for rfc6844bis

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 26 October 2018 21:39 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E872D130E5B for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 14:39:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DTawopop4g_d for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 14:39:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2756D130E62 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 14:39:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D923E300A50 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 17:39:44 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id jlLeFQ5l5zMD for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 17:39:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-71-178-45-35.washdc.fios.verizon.net [71.178.45.35]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F23AA300580; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 17:39:43 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <6080ec6e-0b29-c470-5e66-04d0571e502c@eff.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 17:39:44 -0400
Cc: spasm@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <476D9EED-9A6D-40AA-AB2E-57EF6E6EDC3A@vigilsec.com>
References: <F72DABEA-234C-4644-914A-81FBCC86D11B@vigilsec.com> <6080ec6e-0b29-c470-5e66-04d0571e502c@eff.org>
To: Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/p3dhOZ18jxsUcbL5oT9hd2Oo428>
Subject: Re: [lamps] WG Last Call for rfc6844bis
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 21:39:56 -0000

Jacob:
> 
> On 10/11/2018 11:01 AM, Russ Housley wrote:
>> Please review the document and send your comments to the list by 22 October 2018.
>>  If no concerns are raised, the document will be forwarded to the IESG with a request for publication as Proposed Standard.
> 
> It's now 25 October 2018 and AFAICT no unaddressed concerns have been raised. Time to forward the document to IESG?

I agree.  A shepherd write-up is the next step.  Either Tim or I will work on that.

Russ