Re: [lamps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs-01.txt

You are using very different formats to show the examples in Section 5.1 and Section 5.2.  Can you pick one?

Russ

> On Sep 30, 2022, at 12:28 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME WG of the IETF.
> 
>        Title           : Clarification of RFC7030 CSR Attributes definition
>        Authors         : Michael Richardson
>                          Owen Friel
>                          Dr. David von Oheimb
>                          Dan Harkins
>  Filename        : draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs-01.txt
>  Pages           : 9
>  Date            : 2022-09-30
> 
> Abstract:
>   The Enrollment over Secure Transport (EST, RFC7030) is ambiguous in
>   its specification of the CSR Attributes Response.  This has resulted
>   in implementation challenges and implementor confusion.
> 
>   This document updates RFC7030 (EST) and clarifies how the CSR
>   Attributes Response can be used by an EST server to specify both CSR
>   attribute OIDs and also CSR attribute values, in particular X.509
>   extension values, that the server expects the client to include in
>   subsequent CSR request.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs/
> 
> There is also an HTML version available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs-01.html
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs-01
> 
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm