Re: [lamps] Martin Vigoureux's No Record on draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash-sig-09: (with COMMENT)

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 18 September 2019 02:25 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A7CE120219 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 19:25:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H0JGojeUr5rd for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 19:25:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC4061201A3 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 19:25:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27556300AFF for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 22:25:33 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id MBumohqVOK5x for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 22:25:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [5.5.33.20] (unknown [204.194.23.17]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 41256300577; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 22:25:31 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <156875805038.17465.814848713453844421.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 22:25:31 -0400
Cc: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>, Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek@digicert.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <94E79ECE-4ACE-4E4F-9F2B-8CBEC7DE0167@vigilsec.com>
References: <156875805038.17465.814848713453844421.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/pevf2uopOuVpZZ6sr04Fad84awE>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Martin Vigoureux's No Record on draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash-sig-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 02:25:37 -0000

Martin:

Sure.  I'll delete the first one.

Russ


> On Sep 17, 2019, at 6:07 PM, Martin Vigoureux via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Martin Vigoureux has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash-sig-09: No Record
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash-sig/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Hi
> 
> thank you for this document.
> 
>   There have been recent advances in cryptanalysis and advances in the
>   development of quantum computers.  Each of these advances pose a
>   threat to widely deployed digital signature algorithms.
> 
>   Recent advances in cryptoanalysis [BH2013] and progress in the
>   development of quantum computers [NAS2019] pose a threat to widely
>   deployed digital signature algorithms.
> 
> looks redundant.
> 
> -m
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm