Re: [lamps] [EXTERNAL] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-algorithms-14: (with COMMENT)

[Mike Ounsworth <[e-mail]>]

Hi Francesca,

Thank you for the review.

This is my first time through the publication process an as author, so please forgive the dumb question. My understanding of the downref is that this document is Standards Track, but makes a normative ref to the Informational RFC 8018? Does this need further justification?

We wanted to reference an existing definition of PBKDF2 OIDs and ASN.1 structures rather than defining new ones. The definitions in 8018 seemed to be exactly what we needed.

---
Mike Ounsworth

-----Original Message-----
From: Francesca Palombini via Datatracker <[e-mail]>
Sent: June 1, 2022 5:00 PM
To: The IESG <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-algorithms-14: (with COMMENT)

WARNING: This email originated outside of Entrust.
DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you trust the sender and know the content is safe.

______________________________________________________________________
Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-algorithms-14: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/__;!!FJ-Y8qCqXTj2!YP9rRchKZEXSNbB0KuGLhCzYqt8r8v8s-YZ8fzGyHUMANcy2cx5PdWsJn9csh9gKCTzbFzgsccrBnixNdeY$
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-algorithms/__;!!FJ-Y8qCqXTj2!YP9rRchKZEXSNbB0KuGLhCzYqt8r8v8s-YZ8fzGyHUMANcy2cx5PdWsJn9csh9gKCTzbFzgsccrBH_4_69I$



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for the work on this document.

Process note to the IESG: Lars already mentioned this, but reminder - we need to approve RFC 8018 as downref in conformance with RFC 8067 (and add it to the downref registry, since as Russ pointed it out, it has already been Last Called as downref for RFC 9045:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/mmBskP8o1BjKCSYoOXAj1Ik0grA/__;!!FJ-Y8qCqXTj2!YP9rRchKZEXSNbB0KuGLhCzYqt8r8v8s-YZ8fzGyHUMANcy2cx5PdWsJn9csh9gKCTzbFzgsccrB_xmoy5k$  ) since it was not Last Called for this document.

Francesca



Any email and files/attachments transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If this message has been sent to you in error, you must not copy, distribute or disclose of the information it contains. Please notify Entrust immediately and delete the message from your system.