[lamps] Dashboard and Study on CAA Adoption

Quirin Scheitle <scheitle@net.in.tum.de> Fri, 15 December 2017 15:09 UTC

Return-Path: <scheitle@net.in.tum.de>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5807B1200CF for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 07:09:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OtOAA8MvjqRK for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 07:09:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-out1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de (mail-out1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de [131.159.0.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD1CC128DF6 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 07:09:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.net.in.tum.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E1; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 16:09:26 +0100 (CET)
From: Quirin Scheitle <scheitle@net.in.tum.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Message-Id: <61DCD88E-6716-4F15-A747-593C6F05E95A@net.in.tum.de>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 16:09:26 +0100
To: spasm@ietf.org, mozilla-dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/qBHYaNpNrMOqe4UVsyF1ll8NNr8>
Subject: [lamps] Dashboard and Study on CAA Adoption
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 15:09:54 -0000

Dear all,

some colleagues and I want to share an academic study on CAA we have been working on in the past months. 
We hope that our findings can provide quantitative data to assist further discussion, such as the “CAA-simplification” draft at IETF and work at the validation-wg at CABF.
We also give specific recommendations how *we think* that CAA can be improved.

The results, paper, and a dashboard tracking CAA adoption are available under 

https://caastudy.github.io/

[Please note that the paper discusses facts as of Nov 30]
We will be happy to elaborate some aspects further, the paper does not discuss all the details. 
We have discussed previous drafts with various individuals in this community and thank them for their inputs.

Kind regards
Quirin and team