[lamps] Call for adoption for draft-dkg-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 01 April 2021 20:36 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB1673A228C for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 13:36:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AKnvhPFLCe4p for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 13:36:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 964923A228B for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 13:36:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F33300B8F for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 16:36:43 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id erJ9Fkyns4Ro for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 16:36:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.161] (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BFEB430026C for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 16:36:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.17\))
Message-Id: <FF9C1FC4-78AF-4AC2-AD8D-973FB9270C84@vigilsec.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 16:36:43 -0400
To: LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.17)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/qLN5OXrxBNxzvSz31Xt0mtpnNNM>
Subject: [lamps] Call for adoption for draft-dkg-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 20:36:48 -0000

A re-charter has been sent to the IESG that includes this new work item:

> 4. Provide concrete guidance for implementers of email user agents
> to promote interoperability of end-to-end cryptographic protection
> of email messages.  This may include guidance about the generation,
> interpretation, and handling of protected messages; management of the
> relevant certificates; documentation of how to avoid common failure
> modes; strategies for deployment in a mixed environment; as well as
> test vectors and examples that can be used by implementers and
> interoperability testing.  The resulting robust consensus among email
> user agent implementers is expected to provide more usable and useful
> cryptographic security for email users.

Assuming that the IESG approves the re-charter text, should the LAMPS WG adopt draft-dkg-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance as the starting point for this work?

Please voice your support or raise concerns by 14 April 2021.

Russ