[lamps] Call for adoption of draft-richardson-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 28 July 2022 22:45 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC6EC1C7DB2 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 15:45:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x01J3XeA7DVv for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 15:45:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com []) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EAADC1C7DAA for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 15:45:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost []) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68973122203 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 18:45:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [] (pfs.iad.rg.net []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 569E0122202 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 18:45:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 18:45:41 -0400
References: <PH0PR00MB10003EC6A096FE0A363BBFB9F5459@PH0PR00MB1000.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <PH0PR00MB10002A7A2850A1333B4F6C00F54A9@PH0PR00MB1000.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
To: LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR00MB10002A7A2850A1333B4F6C00F54A9@PH0PR00MB1000.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
Message-Id: <3D129B4D-5A3B-46BA-95CA-DA8E46BBE552@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.09 on
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/qYx0_au8aJ6sJHJkDuZJAM0Ihyo>
Subject: [lamps] Call for adoption of draft-richardson-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 22:45:44 -0000

There has been some discussion of https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-richardson-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs/

Should the LAMPS WG adopt “Clarification of RFC7030 CSR Attributes definition” in draft-richardson-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs-04?

Please reply to this message by Monday, 15 August 2022 to voice your support or opposition to adoption.

On behalf of the LAMPS WG Chairs,