[lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8649 (6976)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 19 May 2022 23:29 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5865C237D10 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 May 2022 16:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ojHh22BxMzQ8 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 May 2022 16:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1ABA5C237D15 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 May 2022 16:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id E2096163315; Thu, 19 May 2022 16:29:07 -0700 (PDT)
To: housley@vigilsec.com, rdd@cert.org, paul.wouters@aiven.io, housley@vigilsec.com, tim.hollebeek@digicert.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: alexnora479@gmail.com, spasm@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220519232907.E2096163315@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 16:29:07 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/rKJu_FvhXa-sxcGjdvkzK4aY9q4>
Subject: [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8649 (6976)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 23:29:11 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8649, "Hash Of Root Key Certificate Extension". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6976 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Clara smith <alexnora479@gmail.com> Section: 8119 Original Text ------------- Yes Corrected Text -------------- No Notes ----- Something good Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8649 (draft-ietf-lamps-hash-of-root-key-cert-extn-07) -------------------------------------- Title : Hash Of Root Key Certificate Extension Publication Date : August 2019 Author(s) : R. Housley Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8649 (6976) RFC Errata System
- Re: [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8649 (… Russ Housley
- Re: [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8649 (… Chris Smiley