IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Doodle poll to find a date for the LAMPS Virtual Interim Focused on PQC

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sun, 01 August 2021 20:04 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6FBF3A0C59 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 13:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XTZNjbHGpVg8 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 13:04:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E3453A0C58 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 13:04:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id F4025389A8; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 16:08:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id oFJEY9w1SAye; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 16:08:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 491A7389A7; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 16:08:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06AD6B24; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 16:04:39 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CBE95F06-7678-4D63-B39E-D66DDFC2906D@vigilsec.com>
References: <CBE95F06-7678-4D63-B39E-D66DDFC2906D@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2021 16:04:38 -0400
Message-ID: <18295.1627848278@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/rLmXy9L0OtbgjiCZUhsDKyXNV9I>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Doodle poll to find a date for the LAMPS Virtual Interim Focused on PQC
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2021 20:04:49 -0000

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
    > We did not include PQC on the agenda for IETF 111 because we wanted to
    > dedicate a whole virtual interim to the topic.  This pool is to find a
    > time in the first two weeks of September.  Please provide your
    > availabily promptly so we can get the meeting scheduled.

    > https://doodle.com/poll/3m8ca2yyfvttb78w

Thanks for this.  I think that this makes a lot of sense.
Are there documents we should read for this?
(I don't see anything on the DT attached to lamps, but I'm sure that we had
some proposals being discussed)

Can you add them as additional documents at:
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/lamps/documents/manage/
(guessed URL)

I was going to ask if we could use the second most popular time for the
needed CSRATTRs discussion, but then it occurs to me that the list of
interested parties is probably different.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email