Re: [lamps] draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake comment

"Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)" <pkampana@cisco.com> Fri, 29 March 2019 18:32 UTC

Return-Path: <pkampana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 553E7120284 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 11:32:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kpyfh4XO_FAW for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 11:32:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67992120283 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 11:32:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1212; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1553884335; x=1555093935; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=P2YBQSNcdhmhcy9CqoaiQtEtD5CXVnBzQrDSWUf8c/E=; b=U1LFs5kgKZPH4rK9BN//5LKwXhEhHfcMzjvF9JCI1+fCF++panFfhWS7 3ZgkgceEWwvo0vfsnkRQJrkcO7zXOXcP6QK2ffB0g0hlG1Qe9QfQsJ5tD DDVtUo/EPQdih8rC7iVJkNbrppxAkhSwSAO/2kmTLpbPRmTtaMsv7Xt+W I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AEAABHZJ5c/4sNJK1kGgEBAQEBAgE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEHAgEBAQGBUQUBAQEBCwGCEGiBAycKhASIHIspgg2YPYF7DgEBGAuESQI?= =?us-ascii?q?XhSAiNAkNAQEDAQEJAQMCbRwMhUoBAQEBAwEBIRE6FwQCAQgRBAEBAwImAgI?= =?us-ascii?q?CJQsVCAgCBAESCIMbgXUPqTSBL4onBYELJAGLMheBQD+EIz6CYQEBhGuCVwO?= =?us-ascii?q?MfphECQKTSiKCA4YLjBqLOJNIAhEVgS4fOIFWcBU7gmyLDIU/QTGPPIEfAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,285,1549929600"; d="scan'208";a="252336805"
Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 29 Mar 2019 18:32:14 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-007.cisco.com (xch-aln-007.cisco.com [173.36.7.17]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x2TIWEfu028704 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 29 Mar 2019 18:32:14 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-010.cisco.com (173.36.7.20) by XCH-ALN-007.cisco.com (173.36.7.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 13:32:13 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-010.cisco.com ([173.36.7.20]) by XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com ([173.36.7.20]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.003; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 13:32:13 -0500
From: "Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)" <pkampana@cisco.com>
To: Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com>, SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lamps] draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake comment
Thread-Index: AQHU5h3yX+jReKa5REitDKe7PHqpnKYi7shw
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 18:32:13 +0000
Message-ID: <8d60195262a648c7bbbe1707295b934f@XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com>
References: <A2D916AF-64AC-46A4-BA38-37A645F0D290@seantek.com>
In-Reply-To: <A2D916AF-64AC-46A4-BA38-37A645F0D290@seantek.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.82.223.81]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.17, xch-aln-007.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-6.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/rMKv2tWSwx-iOL6mnNPHhbQP194>
Subject: Re: [lamps] draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake comment
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 18:32:18 -0000

Thanks Sean. Good catch. We will address this along with anything else that comes from the RFC Editor. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Spasm <spasm-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Sean Leonard
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2019 6:55 AM
To: SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
Subject: [lamps] draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake comment

Although perhaps the RFC Editor will catch this, I noticed that a typo regarding SHAKE128 and SHAKE256.

draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-08 has 52 instances of “SHAKE128” and 51 instances of “SHAKE256”. However, “SHAKE-128” and “SHAKE-256” appear once each in “Section 4. Identifiers.” It seems that the more common representation is without the hyphen. So, please fix it to remove the hyphen.

Thanks,

Sean
_______________________________________________
Spasm mailing list
Spasm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm